From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id GEXdKYfdNmC1WwAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 23:13:11 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id 0EijJYfdNmBZXwAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 23:13:11 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64039EECA for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 00:13:11 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1]:54694 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lF3LC-0001Ic-JM for larch@yhetil.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 18:13:10 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45704) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lF3L4-0001IT-RO for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 18:13:02 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:52873) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lF3L4-0000U5-Jx for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 18:13:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lF3L4-0001jo-FZ for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 18:13:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#46391] [PATCH 0/1] Canonicalize-path load-path option Resent-From: zimoun Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 23:13:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46391 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 46391-done@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 46391-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D46391.16142083436636 (code D ref 46391); Wed, 24 Feb 2021 23:13:02 +0000 Received: (at 46391-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Feb 2021 23:12:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36186 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lF3KR-0001ix-I8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 18:12:23 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-f43.google.com ([209.85.221.43]:33162) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lF3KP-0001if-AJ for 46391-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 18:12:21 -0500 Received: by mail-wr1-f43.google.com with SMTP id 7so3461784wrz.0 for <46391-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 15:12:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=uaYenRLGWFfMgU7sRoSJt5JiGPASIleU0C/uXjFxswA=; b=XI/kTtY9QI44IA+3sUAMAo4QSPeTzmtvpqs7W37gIAVZ0zkwk5jZ/LTrOK0YVlAJOD YR98leyglqlojGwxWJ92K8OGbTPnNJQ7Ven7iGxaeY9fs/XuRV+5sB5j1bg+YU+jjOrq 4firwMPCV+caFD68ceBzZLL2YCI6pP6w9JUBXx3MGA1WN6yD01sdcyAZYxiMqDYEBVti /smXTgyOgmbPXS8R/qaphnhD04354W7cRkfHoQC32dnFAXWkd5O/bTWmJtW5RgDlbROT GGD607kL/x7KStm7Opwdm6jcakO+6qguTVtzCQBGVDNSRm415TZIlNOD3wwKc+0L370G 19kA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=uaYenRLGWFfMgU7sRoSJt5JiGPASIleU0C/uXjFxswA=; b=phCRp4b7j6l7AgspQGUNDqqqaoQsw1oTAqwEwrJzX0ax67nzMi6uB55X/n3fdWrRBk B0QQsEwZUImgyjRXrE1/SOc4TAi/JLulUUHKHX87Syuv8aHROSO9401hIjgp/3xeqdKs eA2JZ2nSjYg/SJyROy4bv7iXRsxZwpsIKTR45Ar2QMjrbUzXgdNlR2NqoHvAEMc55izV /Ml341nOv+2438EJNxf7PuQ/Kz6T+MAwH+prneIDwHAgA8gwdkD/Z0g4hha010Wg1wR2 wNW9Bhq7ig9MNir9bDHCo88R5c9qLAtuj5eBAFXBi1gwFWuNtVVlb1j1v0nkikoPONEP OC6g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533iVCd2I5SERV5w2PvHf1Hh5E8Kgn50a/xUCMcDcZPwqSI47tfE 7W6Xblr7+9QpbzAi9s6Yo12vV1wy+pM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyyhaFXfV0aTf0u92HbaUagxRGR22FX/zoHG31pgQVQI5NP2QfEPe3ZXb+BlXuko39KcmgdWw== X-Received: by 2002:adf:fb52:: with SMTP id c18mr376744wrs.4.1614208335394; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 15:12:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from lili ([2a01:e0a:59b:9120:65d2:2476:f637:db1e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s20sm98674wmj.36.2021.02.24.15.12.14 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 24 Feb 2021 15:12:15 -0800 (PST) From: zimoun In-Reply-To: <87blc92ie4.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20210209004011.14176-1-zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> <87blc92ie4.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 00:04:07 +0100 Message-ID: <86lfbdkqzc.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -1.27 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b="XI/kTtY9"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 64039EECA X-Spam-Score: -1.27 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: NQL+0QuNbwiW Hi Ludo, On Wed, 24 Feb 2021 at 23:46, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > I=E2=80=99m discovering this after having independently addreses #46390, = sorry > about that! (Perhaps we should always send patches that fix bugs to the > corresponding bug report rather than/in addition to guix-patches?) Anyway, because your patch is better than mine. :-) In general, I try to at least mention in bug-guix the number from guix-patches. Sometimes, I directly send the patch to bug-guix. It depends on my mood I guess. :-) Well, I do not have an opinion. Maybe tiny patch (like this) that fixes bug should be sent to the corresponding bug report. And larger patches should be sent to guix-patches; it eases to keep separated the discussion about the bug and about the patches, IMHO. Cheers, simon