From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp11.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms9.migadu.com with LMTPS id QGDxGNUPLGR84wAASxT56A (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 04 Apr 2023 13:53:57 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp11.migadu.com with LMTPS id 2JvcGNUPLGQK7wAA9RJhRA (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 04 Apr 2023 13:53:57 +0200 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3930D392CD for ; Tue, 4 Apr 2023 13:53:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pjfDq-0007pU-C8; Tue, 04 Apr 2023 07:53:10 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pjfDn-0007hG-KX for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Apr 2023 07:53:07 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pjfDk-0007oN-Ir for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Apr 2023 07:53:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pjfDk-0000Sz-FR for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Apr 2023 07:53:04 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#62584] [PATCH] services: Add error/success service type. Resent-From: Simon Tournier Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2023 11:53:04 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 62584 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: wontfix patch To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , =?UTF-8?Q?=E5=AE=8B=E6=96=87=E6=AD=A6?= Cc: 62584@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 62584-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B62584.16806091251631 (code B ref 62584); Tue, 04 Apr 2023 11:53:04 +0000 Received: (at 62584) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Apr 2023 11:52:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46705 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pjfCn-0000Pz-50 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Apr 2023 07:52:05 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-f42.google.com ([209.85.128.42]:41865) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pjfCl-0000OL-0O for 62584@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Apr 2023 07:52:03 -0400 Received: by mail-wm1-f42.google.com with SMTP id r19-20020a05600c459300b003eb3e2a5e7bso19878858wmo.0 for <62584@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 04 Apr 2023 04:52:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; t=1680609117; x=1683201117; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=Iru2BuT4woPMfaerHQSCpA/4z8EglC5bWBlHiuGiDM8=; b=FeKn318MKWcxLMWLrIwp0dWJ3N0TVbLyXlwefmNKxsGsA5UANQZTHCGEtnQn9gdxYm mDYcWBg4vMqiR1QR3GFSLRg4xy2WyuJnQFcubTrcQ1O3eDnhb5FSWk4DXgcbVX0eUocB 6jlo+DLGycxHoqxrE92esyD+Nf2vEycXgARcgW+IiXQS5NAY4ZY7Sse9guI57JnKbvPe Wo4fR7HgHgHVhCcd7SHzqUTlDtu1RBb4NUwPPAfz0lPOAoguINSKqgOYxiuKcfn46Z6n SyremLl8fdydDy7jzyQTVc0I1VyX2nkXOaJ5jc0QBS9ZNWXFyYypVWz+jx4I1Fe8pSC7 spWw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1680609117; x=1683201117; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Iru2BuT4woPMfaerHQSCpA/4z8EglC5bWBlHiuGiDM8=; b=usl1WgPM4TMxLlZ0NJV5/ed/AAMcfK7PiLsAIka/nIX2akFjBYHpfzq+UHb6QTb7d+ T5tiXEavTqA3yxOliNJ3KGNHH20P0jLzj/OwybcMf9+msTPpIlK8chFEPOkvZL+SU4p5 LTNhh9uKMef9PgKkpPr9xmZKoMhWNC8lDVROeGcLbZuPspa51me0D7T57nEXVvrOV9Cm 2XO1Yjdgw9mVBmsOAG/L6Y7SrshGZ+8yGHbzrKJNxhcVjUpmnVA2LaNlBblts6ODZTrC MMQmqg4ivEXcqsGodSGUCBpSFCV3RA+l1GzCUO8VkGQ+40qwTzK6RCXPqILUdLVjkGLm eGoQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AAQBX9ctFQb1b6Z0yxUrgC6fz1/8jYCzcJVXXJGHHmPPG7PWw2fYL3UW xwsT0yJOPI5nVH5NtnGqEvwnseuC+Vg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350aHM9KKME5rsQ4z5ZL68iDBbF8HeqQgO5Rk6XoVGwg6QSaxPABncRU5YkAHquDa+p2ykv+veA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:5106:b0:3f0:330b:d3d4 with SMTP id o6-20020a05600c510600b003f0330bd3d4mr2120518wms.4.1680609117438; Tue, 04 Apr 2023 04:51:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lili ([2a01:e0a:59b:9120:65d2:2476:f637:db1e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c2-20020adfe702000000b002d6f285c0a2sm12191302wrm.42.2023.04.04.04.51.57 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 04 Apr 2023 04:51:57 -0700 (PDT) From: Simon Tournier In-Reply-To: <878rfav28x.fsf_-_@gnu.org> References: <20230401072842.13315-1-ludo@gnu.org> <87y1nbevqp.fsf@envs.net> <87jzyvfst1.fsf_-_@gnu.org> <878rfav28x.fsf_-_@gnu.org> Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2023 12:59:40 +0200 Message-ID: <86jzyrvroj.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1680609237; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=HiqWRSZ80nNHExgygnst2EXvUc0XyMr2RVdMf0bnMOckcaDPh6xOcXo4AnlDmxq0d/fKK4 ZPe+6uuPxI8OQZZB3xio5V7Gjdg29hBCo/rKBRQxrU81OnueL0jQ12sNVGcnlcrNj/ce7t fdQkwNPrTdeIttgg14WQgqqaW6WpJovHd64mXvbtY6ElBNee5o1r1SXIoaKz3ODBibw/Du 76O39iv89IJZOr45vJ23wJ9eNJTKgHTC8o/tbSBoFHRvd0X5AelXJW57HZxIoQ9A9inlby QQvfa33FqgvXUUGJazy2/Kby0oYUOhLLqARgi27IXb+9Z1WaEjOWw5itV/UqFQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=FeKn318M; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1680609237; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=Iru2BuT4woPMfaerHQSCpA/4z8EglC5bWBlHiuGiDM8=; b=g8aULEmCyqCkTbgGCqLj1/vG8iOkwgJMax3lZuNawYV08HHtg1OblPn2UrfNNTozUzXFhL 77KiF23posZ+mAeQ6AAxuulHuq4ZCWqwPaJLt1RBeugNf5N/rbnaSZLdKV5g3jSgyV80Lp Iid+0W8fP8BIa8nbefQDzcJnbjvw4mKHGAZfySJtS479Rrj4lYw4/o0TzfWrUnP2np5F84 FHJAlbHNp8u5Xishm4XWIj4ZMl/0DlQcP5a3mabrzpJhn5k71Ihk1yp6+f4gUiS9z0e/GV CXZsHPjyUYmejFhfNTjOCNDn7YXdu7NeQbPBlyJ0G5Nw2fG+Wttsppm8cr+wng== X-Migadu-Spam-Score: 7.28 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=FeKn318M; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Spam-Score: 7.28 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 3930D392CD X-TUID: 7tvbTJyD5zZZ Hi Ludo, On Sun, 02 Apr 2023 at 15:32, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > Ludovic Court=C3=A8s skribis: > >> BTW, I wrote about the rationale in more detail in a blog post: >> >> https://guix.gnu.org/en/blog/2023/reinstating-an-iconic-error-message/ > > In hindsight, seen from April 2nd, it seems that the status quo might be > preferable after all. > > Closing! Well, I am not sure to understand if it is an April=E2=80=99s fool (so a go= od one! ;-)) or a serious patch. In both cases, I am missing why it would not be possible to have the default =E2=80=9Cerror =3D success=E2=80=9C, since it is potentially possib= le to turn it off and so have something as no error =3D> success. Emacs has ton of historical weird defaults. Basically, I do not see the issue with such defaults if there is an explanation (in the manual, say). Cheers, simon