From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: George myglc2 Clemmer Subject: Re: How to make XQuartz/MacOS <--> IceCat/GuixSD fast? Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 01:15:35 -0500 Message-ID: <86efmnzo8o.fsf@gmail.com> References: <86tvvnasch.fsf@gmail.com> <871sipklym.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58058) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ec3UF-0006IB-LV for help-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 01:15:44 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ec3UA-0000nh-MX for help-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 01:15:43 -0500 Received: from mail-qt0-x22e.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::22e]:36373) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ec3UA-0000nT-Gv for help-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 01:15:38 -0500 Received: by mail-qt0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id z11so1825983qtm.3 for ; Wed, 17 Jan 2018 22:15:38 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <871sipklym.fsf@gmail.com> (Chris Marusich's message of "Tue, 16 Jan 2018 23:01:37 -0800") List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Help-Guix" To: Chris Marusich Cc: help-guix On 01/16/2018 at 23:01 Chris Marusich writes: > George myglc2 Clemmer writes: > >> I want to speed up IceCat on my GuixSD headless server. I am using >> XQuartz/MacOS over 1000BaseT to reach a server with 3.4GHz Intel E3-1240 >> V3 CPU and SSD storage. ISTM this is about as fast as one can make a >> headless server. But IceCat is unusably slow. So I wonder ... >> >> Do you run IceCat remotely from a GuixSD desktop and get good >> performance? If so, please tell me about your setup. >> >> Would Wayland make it faster? >> >> Would an upgrade to a CPU w/GPU make it faster? >> >> TIA - George > > For what it's worth, I have run Firefox in similar situations (not > involving GuixSD), and I have always found it to be un-usably slow over > a remote X connection. I never bothered to try to make it faster; I'm > intrigued that you were able to make it better at all. > > You may also consider doing the following to speed things up: > > - Use compression (e.g., "ssh -C") (helps quite a bit in some cases) > - Limit the color palette to the fewest colors possible (helps a > little) Thanks Chris. I used -C when forced to run X over the inet or slower links at work but it didn't occur to me to try it on 1000BaseT. I will check these ideas out and let you know if they make a meaningful diff. - George