From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id gEUwHjcF9l/3LwAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 06 Jan 2021 18:45:11 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id GMQTGjcF9l+hFwAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 06 Jan 2021 18:45:11 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC5C594050C for ; Wed, 6 Jan 2021 18:45:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:33254 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kxDnx-0000e3-H2 for larch@yhetil.org; Wed, 06 Jan 2021 13:45:09 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56654) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kxDnq-0000dr-IG for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Jan 2021 13:45:02 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:33986) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kxDnq-0004FF-Ai for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Jan 2021 13:45:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kxDnq-0008Kf-71 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Jan 2021 13:45:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#45531] [PATCH] gnu: hdf5: Update to 1.12.0. Resent-From: zimoun Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2021 18:45:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 45531 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Vincent Legoll Received: via spool by 45531-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B45531.160995868431989 (code B ref 45531); Wed, 06 Jan 2021 18:45:02 +0000 Received: (at 45531) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Jan 2021 18:44:44 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45532 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kxDnY-0008Jt-5V for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 06 Jan 2021 13:44:44 -0500 Received: from mail-ej1-f50.google.com ([209.85.218.50]:43736) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kxDnW-0008Jg-J0 for 45531@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 06 Jan 2021 13:44:42 -0500 Received: by mail-ej1-f50.google.com with SMTP id jx16so6334021ejb.10 for <45531@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 06 Jan 2021 10:44:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=K+IlpBnCeZ8Bfxt4U2vqgXIhjp30DLj5YRtgmISZUCE=; b=eYf0oYI/pur7SZdQ7/iuOD67V23Wmbj1XM8VINfpa9O8mpJhU1WXliZpPaV39qZEBr F2XBaBEoiB3oxpIEFqEyIOvuSaZ4rCA34Hh0p1GWNUHjHUwUEalfD8+2vxsm63ycL9P5 DcR6HqgG06NCNtZMmIf3gIXxXhwlbPrKmsTCeXaxwKc4MKZUXeT9Da+Dgqxn5VDXHCsP bHPKxehiMEkJjdDNm+9JHa/mn9ALgCy9iUep38V69Fmkbjj6BH+SNjVpeA0a9O697soV +i7djVvktdeTdVjgfcAQRfoJYiBAf6Rybb6ZH6zyzAWyZP9e1n5eFDRAw/hQT/0Ip4FF vO2A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=K+IlpBnCeZ8Bfxt4U2vqgXIhjp30DLj5YRtgmISZUCE=; b=BpBRrj2gy6u/fSHsUyEpB9xCGqoVJMOG5fzCrjnYvmkQezIERtHr9Uq+jzLN+t2Ini sVlZd5UFHJgSFVJVYCyYlMxTJuL4talYajVEpbT6mlvZckwKdoSzaz2+xNX1vjDM6qQ+ KYZ5QHSbrHGvWNk+W7wjXXoKPN7DVuCHq2w6YuZYaqrtPq4gOlI2ZWjCa5cNiUu62UNG 0fIqHils566FEOFiW8XKcx0UUVg8AAwTPKd5Jy6s8j+aJe//5hQQO8dRXjxUc5S0vPkv 31VLRv9HMmB1oBg9b3xpp4OGIznEl2KB0DniK9FHzxzXQycdicWvocL0L8cq8p1TU/7g Cn4w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5324Pu42XioYVbz//EA+W0Y/mHhppZRuI13qXsOdQXkslvMCBD8x 22v/kBlx3ZRMdjCCNG7nzK4boTocBYU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxKzws/m6XaJ4pqpaH1GDj4lWCVfrQzxIaHPGOpwe7sib6ismpfxY8noIFWy8OagP2z8xvojA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:1db2:: with SMTP id u18mr3867096ejh.440.1609958676717; Wed, 06 Jan 2021 10:44:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from lili ([2a01:e0a:59b:9120:65d2:2476:f637:db1e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e21sm1732268edv.96.2021.01.06.10.44.35 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 06 Jan 2021 10:44:36 -0800 (PST) From: zimoun In-Reply-To: References: <20201229121203.5353-1-vincent.legoll@gmail.com> <86lfdfrvmj.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2021 19:38:09 +0100 Message-ID: <86czyhykq6.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 45531@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -1.24 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (headers rsa verify failed) header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=eYf0oYI/; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: EC5C594050C X-Spam-Score: -1.24 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: eNS/3paRaipn Hi, On Tue, 05 Jan 2021 at 10:34, Vincent Legoll wro= te: > On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 7:35 PM zimoun wrote: >> Please check that all the packages depending on hdf5-1.10 correctly >> build with 1.12.0, for example: freecad, libmedfile, etc. >> >> And also hdf5-parallel-openmpi which inherits from, so packages >> depending on that too. > > Is this specific to that package or should I always rebuild all the > dependencies (& their dependencies) for each package update ? I do not know if there is a rule. But hdf5 is used by many scientific packages and so changing the default version needs some care, IMHO. Upgrading the version could lead to annoying breakages and it is better to fix them at this upgrading time than to discover them later. Well, I am not sure about your initial intention with your patch, a) add the new variable hdf5-1.12 b) change the variable hdf5-1.10 by hdf5-1.12 which means replace all the occurrences of hdf5-1.10 and check everything builds; note the default hdf5 is changed too so it is a lot of rebuilds Some packages specifically depends on hdf5-1.8 so maybe some packages also specifically require hdf5-1.10; I have not checked. These 9 packages specifically use hdf5-1.10: hdf5-parallel-openmpi, freecad, libmedfile, hdf5-blosc, python-h5py, python-tables, sbcl-hdf5-cffi, r-rhdf5lib, sra-tools so they need special care, at least. :-) My point is =E2=80=9Cguix refresh -l hdf5=E2=80=9D says the upgrade could h= ave an impact on a couple of packages and I just wanted be sure that you were aware of that. :-) All the best, simon