[bug#54737] gnu: python-multipart: Update to 0.2.4.

[Peter Polidoro <peter@polidoro.io>]

I looked at my notes and found that this was indeed a mistake. I 
need the python-multipart pypi package, not the multipart pypi 
package.

You can close this, thank you for catching my error. I apologize 
for the confusion and for your time.

Peter Polidoro <peter@polidoro.io> writes:

> [1. text/plain]
> Hi. Good catch. I may have made a mistake when choosing between 
> these two
> unfortunately named pypi packages. I need one of these two as a 
> dependency for
> another Guix package. I am traveling at the moment, but I will 
> double check this
> when I return in a few days. If I do need multipart instead of 
> python-multipart,
> perhaps there is a better way to name the Guix packages to cause 
> less confusion.
> Thanks!
>
>> On Jul 29, 2022, at 3:38 PM, Maxime Devos 
>> <maximedevos@telenet.be> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>> 
>>>  (define-public python-multipart
>>>    (package
>>>      (name "python-multipart")
>>> -    (version "0.0.5")
>>> -    (source (origin
>>> -              (method url-fetch)
>>> -              (uri (pypi-uri "python-multipart" version))
>>> -              (sha256
>>> -               (base32
>>> - "0hzshd665rl1bkwvaj9va4j3gs8nmb478fbvligx20663xhmzfzp"))))
>>> +    (version "0.2.4")
>>> +    (source
>>> +      (origin
>>> +        (method url-fetch)
>>> +        (uri (pypi-uri "multipart" version))
>>> +        (sha256
>>> +          (base32 
>>> "1jr24lm931pkh4x0amr19w5qknrckcg4z3k1zvz9cw5wc19j1fh6"))))
>> 
>> What's the reason for changing from the python-multipart to 
>> multipart? I've
>> looked at the home page and the pypi page, and it doesn't state 
>> that the
>> latter is a successor of the former, so these look like 
>> unrelated projects or
>> a typosquatting attack.
>> 
>> Greetings,
>> Maxime.
>
> [2. application/pgp-keys; OpenPGP_0x49E3EE22191725EE.asc]...
>
> [3. application/octet-stream; OpenPGP_signature]...