From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59056) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dAe17-0004mR-6s for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 16 May 2017 11:04:05 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dAe14-0000Hh-4Q for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 16 May 2017 11:04:05 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:46240) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dAe14-0000HW-1f for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 16 May 2017 11:04:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dAe13-0000de-Qa for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 16 May 2017 11:04:01 -0400 Subject: bug#26339: [PATCH v4 1/7] bootloader: Add extlinux support. Resent-Message-ID: References: <20170514074803.25556-1-m.othacehe@gmail.com> <20170514074803.25556-2-m.othacehe@gmail.com> <87lgpzwoxj.fsf@gnu.org> <86h90lt15r.fsf@gmail.com> <20170516163840.35a53ef7@scratchpost.org> <86d1b8ua7y.fsf@gmail.com> <20170516170030.15c8990c@scratchpost.org> From: Mathieu Othacehe In-reply-to: <20170516170030.15c8990c@scratchpost.org> Date: Tue, 16 May 2017 17:03:45 +0200 Message-ID: <86bmqsu9m6.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Danny Milosavljevic Cc: 26339@debbugs.gnu.org > Yes. If an extlinux config file is there, u-boot prefers it even to u-boot's native config file (the latter is more like a list of commands than a configuration). Ok then, would the following bootloader be ok ? --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- (define extlinux-bootloader-no-installer (bootloader (inherit extlinux-bootloader) (installer #f))) --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---