From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id QNQANgJ4bl8hagAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 23:06:42 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id YKwCMgJ4bl+gXgAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 23:06:42 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 407049403C9 for ; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 23:06:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:50580 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kLwnZ-0000QV-1H for larch@yhetil.org; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 19:06:41 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47948) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kLwnQ-0000QO-OW for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 19:06:32 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-x329.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::329]:37323) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kLwnO-0005S6-E8 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 19:06:32 -0400 Received: by mail-wm1-x329.google.com with SMTP id a9so973479wmm.2 for ; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 16:06:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=JWzbeAZjq6mtS9cqnned3BCzu+JlayCCk1XYczpztcc=; b=S9g4bCelsyga+5FB1VhenvZkViYp0kWCgtMyOk1S9FZuPRrD7ASAIOGdW2Uw5FM7u8 TIezW2JwrfaR4gNoozMjCQkZ0DTXoAsG/8DIoccQ9JPPYvP5IRPSLbfF5ZXlYIah8jYl EnbSo3U8htfHsDCfW1B5FjY3mhorvVI5xD5Ea9C9HEZ/8tjlrcYuKHAACTgtvQKCOvH0 ZpQqr0jK7Vt9m6Y1Dc/LPRt4oqNUoP2vpF+ZvmpurmEmkjZrnCLOqFXZpkOr8+WIwatS sOFIw0wYr/o0vnyPJR7muU962GT/1kT2cU4baadx8SSBraF0JdE+thiyir/HVO9DrsEY GCew== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=JWzbeAZjq6mtS9cqnned3BCzu+JlayCCk1XYczpztcc=; b=NMeU2KIIyKuquDegS1xdpa4PVBVDtxANFxrBwpvpWsXAQgXIN+68seaVwS1AzwEgcO 9Szslo46uCejzMYMbV2KytE+ucdpHpC15zcumxnpu8JVDk9KTwsanIo49Vb54XMs28Cz /igmulynG2YJbr9bdZwNL5s2OKAUizh24rwPzXo0ylM+odLGDr5gqmSrlw8nHE/yOZjh UNoe6HTJVL3Vs1eD08PlLtGqlUbKFHmRw1jH2jHDixutkC9M3EfBArVfoLC56NbieFI/ CEq1aXrZoGD/uCnhxBhknM1TTj8LtPm0fpKgbHtYpaolmy82jyyzR9IPrqOXeQg+NrG7 B9tQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533OgZ8uSrasoBcbU4qMbqsiNA4u1+91POMHQxbuYWTTwm6wesoc BLVaWX+cxl4KlZfY90w9Gi20jPe51KI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw6cun/brMUAq/9/0vUZIztxu0DwJgtVEwrMKyEJMpIIrZeQ3wSUvJUetZgGHoiQtM35E1tjA== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c341:: with SMTP id l1mr849380wmj.80.1601075187135; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 16:06:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lili ([2a01:e0a:59b:9120:65d2:2476:f637:db1e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h17sm4764216wro.27.2020.09.25.16.06.25 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 25 Sep 2020 16:06:26 -0700 (PDT) From: zimoun To: Giovanni Biscuolo Subject: Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?) In-Reply-To: <87blhutg3n.fsf@roquette.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> References: <86wo0mnjs3.fsf@gmail.com> <87d02e3v61.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87k0wjt774.fsf@roquette.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <87blhutg3n.fsf@roquette.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2020 01:06:25 +0200 Message-ID: <86blhttq1a.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::329; envelope-from=zimon.toutoune@gmail.com; helo=mail-wm1-x329.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Guix Devel Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=S9g4bCel; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 0.09 X-TUID: PyoyJKAoR4FS On Fri, 25 Sep 2020 at 10:28, Giovanni Biscuolo wrote: > If that's the case could you please add a comment in #41732 that points > to #43538 explaining that it solves the use cases of #41732, possibly > with some examples and/or a Coockbook section? Attempt currently happening=E2=80=A6 :-) See: > Re the subject: do you think #43578 can help users in getting > emacs-lucid starting from emacs? Do you have an example please? I do not know. However, I am not personally motivated by emacs-lucid. Maybe I miss something but if I read correctly, this toolkit is old and so I do not know how it is maintained. Is the new HarfBuzz included? Well, #41732 and #43578 change the Emacs VM when compiling Emacs packages and not the rendering toolkit. Other said, compiling Emacs packages with the package emacs or emacs-lucid is exactly the same. The difference between emacs and emacs-lucid is the rendering toolkit, not the VM. AFAIU. > AFAIU having a public emacs-lucid in Guix master is a better solution > for users, but I may be missing something! :-D You mean better because the GTK bug? Well, I am extensively using Emacs and I do not remember hitting this bug. Maybe I do not use Emacs enough. ;-) Cheers, simon