From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id EITyHjsLtF8XCAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 17:41:15 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id UArlGjsLtF/vWAAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 17:41:15 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A6E1940538 for ; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 17:41:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:36108 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kf4yf-0008OJ-Tz for larch@yhetil.org; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 12:41:13 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60604) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kf4w5-0004Tz-Vp for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 12:38:33 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-x334.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::334]:34942) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kf4w3-0006wt-4j; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 12:38:33 -0500 Received: by mail-wm1-x334.google.com with SMTP id w24so4020896wmi.0; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 09:38:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=7XOzFgVR7ULbL7IwZuXajsTmPbGh1QBjbUThGfJrbG8=; b=XakPFEhX0qvBWmOHy9q63gdPkvoQNmadnp8wnV/MRjzOCfCqmnjYhvixg6gpSAfBi4 T3ISNqySU4bhN+kQhDPozqJKsSOz1jA9XzrZVHZB1OukC3OYJXItzZ9V7x700F+1KClR ybPF88PPKIRvbNFceOKHHvEnz9oPpFCpDKR0zt84CoKhzHRFpMBTxJFFRR5xaRqvo45J 1k91tt/iBKt4s+E+nDNH3IuwZewPSDeh71aKRl7Yeb2xcYk/Qwh7J81t2hvSo6Vqvw5/ ArNUW4HGkH21VLxy3eX8rI8ipgdrLsb1o70C1QNw3RBhwbrNogNXWMon5jgFoVgE2V9N /CAA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=7XOzFgVR7ULbL7IwZuXajsTmPbGh1QBjbUThGfJrbG8=; b=NHYow2BuYo7o1Tc+dHa7n/Pfu8rw2Sl408GkR5nNHK4FGYuTP9sFe1LqYlKy1ZHfi5 lvSLzjB2WdhLIWrjKq1LXQofyI6pPU3rlzRxKAYQOiAUr2+YwJiT0X8GwE1/Y+9ciZQ0 jqADKwR4IbhoqLKPTAfwaPzKhhf0YnHYy1u591DfAiMMJ6ek4ySYVNRDXWfgMo8TtjhO BaEy3FztnJ8KkRFPUwEv1wv5xvo8mYFZMiQdewLxBc6ceG103396xv24Qq0Pf/JUOXxg /lOhHbiDBPzl3EieLVGdWx9O5tHCjUZV6TsKC51vIXRSp8CHYj3L+1kzSuRwF3nffe2o 3rHw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530rMbJRMR0jN5DsKskiy/8ZV43n55bEMiqjrwlCeiU6m3Sk4yNl 8KEGfu7ddigwt7CpQe2Ak/c= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy2PmlCdMJULpPi9cGRApB51pArXfO94cRts8k27g8jMzStbDJ/idyk6UWCd7TWT5O7IP4BHg== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c845:: with SMTP id c5mr163657wml.135.1605634709327; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 09:38:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from lili ([2a01:e0a:59b:9120:65d2:2476:f637:db1e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c62sm4634837wme.22.2020.11.17.09.38.28 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 17 Nov 2020 09:38:28 -0800 (PST) From: zimoun To: Danny Milosavljevic Subject: Re: Release: Docker Image? DockerHub? skopeo? In-Reply-To: <20201117173103.31703c84@scratchpost.org> References: <20200922115019.08d40bec@scratchpost.org> <86tuu5fklj.fsf@gmail.com> <20201104155010.0b83ab17@scratchpost.org> <86k0ums3xw.fsf@gmail.com> <20201117173103.31703c84@scratchpost.org> Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 18:30:57 +0100 Message-ID: <868sazoppq.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::334; envelope-from=zimon.toutoune@gmail.com; helo=mail-wm1-x334.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Scanner: ns3122888.ip-94-23-21.eu Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (headers rsa verify failed) header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=XakPFEhX; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 1.09 X-TUID: McK3Ot8cK2gL Hi Danny, On Tue, 17 Nov 2020 at 17:31, Danny Milosavljevic = wrote: >> Wow! The image is huge: >>=20 >> 5.23GB registry.gitlab.com/daym/guix-on-docker latest 884b4a4ddf61=20 >>=20 >> Is it expected? > > Yes, because Docker is silly. It will continue to grow. Oh, bad news! 5.23GB is already too much. > It should be better when you use an external volume as /gnu/store and /va= r/guix. > > Well, from the thread above, you be interested by the Chris=E2=80=99s messa= ge: >> Hum, as in the other message, I am sure I am missing the obvious with >> Docker options. > > Yeah, someone needs to create /tmp. That someone is not Guix (it > would be weird). Created where? Because /tmp is obviously on the host machine. :-) If with the container: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- docker exec guix mkdir -h OCI runtime exec failed: exec failed: container_linux.go:349: starting cont= ainer process caused "exec: \"mkdir\": executable file not found in $PATH":= unknown --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Sorry to be so naive. > /tmp is a common directory, so it does not belong to any of the parts that > have been composed, or maybe there should be a standard "/tmp" part? > > Is there such a standard "/tmp" part in Docker-land? > > Similarly, but worse, with /etc/passwd, /etc/group, /etc/services and so = on. I do not know. >> Currently, it builds master, right? I have not looked but do you think >> it could possible to track the both branches master and version-1.x.y? > > Yes, right now it builds current master. > > Sure, could easily make it do both. Cool! Thanks. Cheers, simon