From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp12.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms5.migadu.com with LMTPS id UDE8AfcsvGMdSwEAbAwnHQ (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 09 Jan 2023 16:04:23 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp12.migadu.com with LMTPS id qE4SAfcsvGMbDwAAauVa8A (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 09 Jan 2023 16:04:23 +0100 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B30E63A74C for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2023 16:04:22 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pEtgw-000533-VH; Mon, 09 Jan 2023 10:04:04 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pEtgt-00052M-Kr for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2023 10:03:59 -0500 Received: from mx1.riseup.net ([198.252.153.129]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pEtgr-0001ea-98 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2023 10:03:59 -0500 Received: from fews2.riseup.net (fews2-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.84]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mail.riseup.net", Issuer "R3" (not verified)) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4NrHJq5sTJzDq9M for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2023 15:03:55 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1673276635; bh=CwnJkYUzm+WTelfUv9XUF0KrPSQcdk6htCs91kL0dxM=; h=References:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-reply-to:From; b=O/PTzwEIoDMuiqvPLaDOdruTtHJ7BA3NnvavdUg114tGgyoVQmGPaqMIds9ouLgHK qBWYzgpQOnmwV5QxztsVmkJLWMxyJ+3hw7wdU/pFRSZ9D9i7k33alsUAfvx1WqHeKZ DQNQmCEYBwjI+yYYdBsLoEBa/OJpdECecgxaKfYs= X-Riseup-User-ID: 1D4165F159785DB1C6084E7F3E6DD2EEAB6B8C8611FF43861E64DF3125942606 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fews2.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4NrHJq0v5Pz20Rm; Mon, 9 Jan 2023 15:03:54 +0000 (UTC) References: <86a62ropeg.fsf@riseup.net> From: Csepp To: Csepp Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Subject: Re: unacknowledged patches Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2023 16:01:00 +0100 In-reply-to: <86a62ropeg.fsf@riseup.net> Message-ID: <867cxvhhrc.fsf@riseup.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=198.252.153.129; envelope-from=raingloom@riseup.net; helo=mx1.riseup.net X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1673276662; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=2lXVqqYsNSx0Jjx860PQ6JhDiD5MgD8AgPi9CzRdN+g=; b=BIG288iNwYzQLp0Lrs/Tcx/VNC3cWunxcNoiNG38lzGspXCIkrikSJ2P0kyJqTgLSSAUgR TT8/TjnHkzkUf/q0ucYAWOswmNpIMR+60h2mtrf0Z6Vr/dpqJTK/9XlVEf+ngBLtnjwebd hVlt80ZePQyIyPO7tsYIvIrfnakr1d/JDkVqS/43m4wogVo+pOew/oFXtiUfhTbmdsnF4L 3vGXBQCisxIbeUYXkmHWRly0wrbXyIbBWOlcR1qleWSVw5WuiGhl+Ly+YW5luM3Fe+hpWK AKri/wRUpeanGejLiSt5ap7TnrsqukY12FtGAU/tEFQf8VBNjyCLLyXqEmKOaw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=riseup.net header.s=squak header.b="O/PTzwEI"; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=riseup.net ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1673276662; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=O5REG53wvLBKuEJQz0lO7slqSYnXH6amXER8mydI8VnyNLxU51U5F6/hEC3SSvsWSQ1RxO l6DN06+qYC3TwOzTUubzbL8R1sQmiWomCADfT+WT7aB4KO6FxLkEm38GeJyRdiSObO+id4 Thm7BWbKon/zKi90Z7OQouVf0L+rvKIrrIoTXL9HSw7vXWz1nkQy45ikEE2NJ1WIwogOlv gNVYEDUmPMbsyF7Qt415hS/yxKUVrM8vrnqB0BYneaQ+nN7zAlKPCj43/FIk9pGCIkyPjY O0iDHMMqqK7LhLp+8hn+SVik2DILxjMyOOJfC6PoEaAG4S4eS/wFQIcoQA68vA== X-Spam-Score: -6.37 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: B30E63A74C Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=riseup.net header.s=squak header.b="O/PTzwEI"; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=riseup.net X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -6.37 X-TUID: D8YUOF2TBDpd Csepp writes: > (asking this here as well, in addition to IRC) > > Hey, I sent a large patch set last night (39 patches) but only recieved > confirmation for 13 of them. What do I need to do to get the rest > acknowledged? > Here are the ones that made it to debbugs: > https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/pkgreport.cgi?package=guix-patches;include=originator%3Acsepp > It's part of my thesis project for getting MirageOS unikernels deployed > with Guix, so it would help if they were accepted sooner rather than > later. > Either way I'll be adding more code during January, so it's not a > showstopper if it's not merged, but I'd rather be upstreaming things > early, so I don't have to rework huge chunks of it later. Thanks to nckx, I managed to merge the accepted ones, but now it looks like all (?) have been merged into https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=60673 even the ones that did not get an issue number before. So I think the mystery has been solved.