From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: George myglc2 Clemmer Subject: best way to reach QEMU VM desktop on headless GuixSD server Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 16:06:04 -0500 Message-ID: <86607yswqr.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52978) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ecHNz-00064a-So for help-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 16:06:12 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ecHNu-0001kg-Vk for help-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 16:06:11 -0500 Received: from mail-qt0-x22b.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::22b]:42732) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ecHNu-0001kR-RJ for help-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 16:06:06 -0500 Received: by mail-qt0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id c2so33783714qtn.9 for ; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 13:06:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from g1 (c-73-167-118-254.hsd1.ma.comcast.net. [73.167.118.254]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m82sm5155193qki.81.2018.01.18.13.06.04 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Thu, 18 Jan 2018 13:06:05 -0800 (PST) List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Help-Guix" To: help-guix It appears that there are 3 ways to reach a QEMU VM desktop on headless GuixSD servers: X11, spice, and maybe VNC. Is that right? Can anyone comment on which has the best performance. My situation: MacOS <-- 1000BaseT --> GuixSD/servers TIA - George