* bug#26786: [PATCH] gnu: emacs-org: Update to 20170502.
@ 2017-05-05 17:43 Vasile Dumitrascu
2017-05-05 20:45 ` Arun Isaac
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Vasile Dumitrascu @ 2017-05-05 17:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 26786; +Cc: Vasile Dumitrascu
* gnu/packages/emacs.scm (emacs-org): Update to 20170502.
---
gnu/packages/emacs.scm | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/emacs.scm b/gnu/packages/emacs.scm
index 74f0ff8b5..04ceb0e4d 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/emacs.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/emacs.scm
@@ -3574,14 +3574,14 @@ passive voice.")
(define-public emacs-org
(package
(name "emacs-org")
- (version "20170210")
+ (version "20170502")
(source (origin
(method url-fetch)
(uri (string-append "http://elpa.gnu.org/packages/org-"
version ".tar"))
(sha256
(base32
- "15415wh3w8d4c8hd7qfrfdjnjb1zppmrkg8cdp7hw2ilyr90c0bn"))))
+ "12inz804j55ycprb2m3ay54d1bhwhjssmn5nrfm7cfklyhfsy27s"))))
(build-system emacs-build-system)
(home-page "http://orgmode.org/")
(synopsis "Outline-based notes management and organizer")
--
2.11.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* bug#26786: [PATCH] gnu: emacs-org: Update to 20170502.
2017-05-05 17:43 bug#26786: [PATCH] gnu: emacs-org: Update to 20170502 Vasile Dumitrascu
@ 2017-05-05 20:45 ` Arun Isaac
2017-05-05 22:06 ` Ludovic Courtès
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Arun Isaac @ 2017-05-05 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 26786-done
Pushed, thanks!
I think we should build directly from org's release tarball at
http://orgmode.org/org-9.0.6.tar.gz instead of using the ELPA
tarball. It somehow feels like we are not building from source but
rather relying on a prepackaged tarball from ELPA. However, Nicolas
Goaziou, the org mode maintainer,
disagrees. https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-08/msg01395.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* bug#26786: [PATCH] gnu: emacs-org: Update to 20170502.
2017-05-05 20:45 ` Arun Isaac
@ 2017-05-05 22:06 ` Ludovic Courtès
2017-05-06 4:07 ` Arun Isaac
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Ludovic Courtès @ 2017-05-05 22:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 26786; +Cc: va511e
Arun Isaac <arunisaac@systemreboot.net> skribis:
> I think we should build directly from org's release tarball at
> http://orgmode.org/org-9.0.6.tar.gz instead of using the ELPA
> tarball. It somehow feels like we are not building from source but
> rather relying on a prepackaged tarball from ELPA. However, Nicolas
> Goaziou, the org mode maintainer,
> disagrees. https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-08/msg01395.html
I find Nicolas’s argument above (that building from ELPA makes the
recipe trivial) pretty convincing.
Why would you suggest using the tarball from orgmode.org?
Ludo’.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* bug#26786: [PATCH] gnu: emacs-org: Update to 20170502.
2017-05-05 22:06 ` Ludovic Courtès
@ 2017-05-06 4:07 ` Arun Isaac
2017-05-06 13:47 ` Ludovic Courtès
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Arun Isaac @ 2017-05-06 4:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 26786
>> I think we should build directly from org's release tarball at
>> http://orgmode.org/org-9.0.6.tar.gz instead of using the ELPA
>> tarball. It somehow feels like we are not building from source but
>> rather relying on a prepackaged tarball from ELPA. However, Nicolas
>> Goaziou, the org mode maintainer,
>> disagrees. https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-08/msg01395.html
>
> I find Nicolas’s argument above (that building from ELPA makes the
> recipe trivial) pretty convincing.
>
> Why would you suggest using the tarball from orgmode.org?
It seems like we are depending on an intermediary (ELPA) instead of
directly building from the original source. I feel that Guix packages
should not depend on other repositories (like ELPA).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* bug#26786: [PATCH] gnu: emacs-org: Update to 20170502.
2017-05-06 4:07 ` Arun Isaac
@ 2017-05-06 13:47 ` Ludovic Courtès
2017-05-06 16:59 ` Arun Isaac
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Ludovic Courtès @ 2017-05-06 13:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Arun Isaac; +Cc: 26786
Arun Isaac <arunisaac@systemreboot.net> skribis:
>>> I think we should build directly from org's release tarball at
>>> http://orgmode.org/org-9.0.6.tar.gz instead of using the ELPA
>>> tarball. It somehow feels like we are not building from source but
>>> rather relying on a prepackaged tarball from ELPA. However, Nicolas
>>> Goaziou, the org mode maintainer,
>>> disagrees. https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-08/msg01395.html
>>
>> I find Nicolas’s argument above (that building from ELPA makes the
>> recipe trivial) pretty convincing.
>>
>> Why would you suggest using the tarball from orgmode.org?
>
> It seems like we are depending on an intermediary (ELPA) instead of
> directly building from the original source. I feel that Guix packages
> should not depend on other repositories (like ELPA).
I agree with this sentiment, but my understanding is that ELPA is not
really an “intermediary”: package maintainers upload directly there, and
some upload only there. So I think it’s OK. Thoughts?
Ludo’.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* bug#26786: [PATCH] gnu: emacs-org: Update to 20170502.
2017-05-06 13:47 ` Ludovic Courtès
@ 2017-05-06 16:59 ` Arun Isaac
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Arun Isaac @ 2017-05-06 16:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 26786
>>>> I think we should build directly from org's release tarball at
>>>> http://orgmode.org/org-9.0.6.tar.gz instead of using the ELPA
>>>> tarball. It somehow feels like we are not building from source but
>>>> rather relying on a prepackaged tarball from ELPA. However, Nicolas
>>>> Goaziou, the org mode maintainer,
>>>> disagrees. https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-08/msg01395.html
>>>
>>> I find Nicolas’s argument above (that building from ELPA makes the
>>> recipe trivial) pretty convincing.
>>>
>>> Why would you suggest using the tarball from orgmode.org?
>>
>> It seems like we are depending on an intermediary (ELPA) instead of
>> directly building from the original source. I feel that Guix packages
>> should not depend on other repositories (like ELPA).
>
> I agree with this sentiment, but my understanding is that ELPA is not
> really an “intermediary”: package maintainers upload directly there, and
> some upload only there. So I think it’s OK. Thoughts?
Yeah, it's not a big deal. We could think of ELPA as some kind of "dual
hosting", instead of as an "intermediary".
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-05-06 17:01 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-05-05 17:43 bug#26786: [PATCH] gnu: emacs-org: Update to 20170502 Vasile Dumitrascu
2017-05-05 20:45 ` Arun Isaac
2017-05-05 22:06 ` Ludovic Courtès
2017-05-06 4:07 ` Arun Isaac
2017-05-06 13:47 ` Ludovic Courtès
2017-05-06 16:59 ` Arun Isaac
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.