From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: csanchezdll@gmail.com (Carlos =?utf-8?Q?S=C3=A1nchez?= de La Lama) Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: gcc-4.9: Update to 4.9.4. Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 16:35:09 +0200 Message-ID: <7tfunlu86a.fsf@gmail.com> References: <7t4m42uque.fsf@gmail.com> <20161024131638.GA22075@jasmine> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57343) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bygLN-0001y9-AT for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 10:35:18 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bygLJ-0007sk-VS for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 10:35:17 -0400 Received: from mail-lf0-x231.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c07::231]:33562) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bygLJ-0007sX-Ny for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 10:35:13 -0400 Received: by mail-lf0-x231.google.com with SMTP id x79so205942519lff.0 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 07:35:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20161024131638.GA22075@jasmine> (Leo Famulari's message of "Mon, 24 Oct 2016 09:16:38 -0400") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Leo Famulari Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org > On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 09:51:53AM +0200, Carlos S=C3=A1nchez de La Lama = wrote: >> gcc-4.9.3 has a bug in long double isinf builtin on PowerPC, which >> affects glibc versions >=3D 2.23. >> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D70117 >>=20 >> * gnu/packages/gcc.scm (gcc-4.9): Update to 4.9.4. > > Is this different from what we have on core-updates? > > http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/tree/gnu/packages/gcc.scm?h=3Dc= ore-updates#n339 Not at all. I am not tracking core-updates, so I had missed that. I will check there in the future. Sorry about that. BTW, is there described somewhere which kind of updates go to core-updates first? Does everything go first to core-updates? I am trying to understand to decide on whether I should use cote-updates as a basis for my contributions instead of master. Thanks! Carlos