From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: csanchezdll@gmail.com (Carlos =?utf-8?Q?S=C3=A1nchez?= de La Lama) Subject: /var/guix/gcroot/profiles points to non-existing /mnt subdirectory Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 09:36:21 +0200 Message-ID: <7t1t1d8fm2.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56829) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bcpDF-0003Jj-Qc for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 03:36:34 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bcpDB-0003PB-Ld for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 03:36:32 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-x22b.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::22b]:37602) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bcpDB-0003P2-F4 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 03:36:29 -0400 Received: by mail-wm0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id i5so57623239wmg.0 for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 00:36:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from boole (galileo.kdpof.com. [88.26.201.16]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 207sm37355185wmb.7.2016.08.25.00.36.26 for (version=TLS1_1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 25 Aug 2016 00:36:27 -0700 (PDT) List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: guix-devel@gnu.org Hi, In my Guix SD installation, I have the following contents inside /var/guix/gcroots: lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 18 ago 24 16:45 booted-system -> /run/booted-system lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 19 ago 24 16:45 current-system -> /run/current-system lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 52 ago 24 16:45 grub.cfg -> /gnu/store/rvcr64gcqvay3g68bsrbcp9kahsnh7an-grub.cfg lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 22 ago 24 16:44 profiles -> /mnt/var/guix/profiles However, /mnt/var/guix/profiles does not exist (there is nothing in /mnt). Shouldn't it point to /var/guix/profiles? I have tried a fresh installation, closely following instructions in the manual, and it happens there as well. I am using 0.10 installation USB image, I don't know if it happens with 0.11. Can someone explain if this symlink is correct, and what is its purpose in that case? Thanks! Carlos