From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4876::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms13.migadu.com with LMTPS id yFxcLlNlxmZyHwAAqHPOHw:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2024 22:08:19 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4876::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0.migadu.com with LMTPS id yFxcLlNlxmZyHwAAqHPOHw (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2024 00:08:19 +0200 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=protonmail.com header.s=protonmail3 header.b=g9SzcIPi; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=quarantine) header.from=protonmail.com ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1724278099; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=mo2hGlLBZlPmtGpZziaUFcNN9CknghGICRWF8YTQRCY=; b=IEvY6JGelEoR49rtXuaHnzsIdbUFPLtypcWzPPp6YO0m8EWvTHLCalsmBEFPW5dv3+uPYx AdIh49tBTM6AXnQokBvu6+T/3LSpDLIg9kGXj9//tNu/FjXa/mRCyitPXgy3b1Zb6ojRph 43CJwnWEFoiarrwVCVLBNiQ4qAFQcM+m5ooj8rdsmP+y3KlLRXYwCj5BdNnM11s+kfv3BQ JaqdAbIhdvIX5mbRFbWkOiJCK0mQQ2CEDYDVHSl30/b7FXClG6LVnUlCI5RCPtM2ZISyOh SB5vsrdzbLptAfEpz4y8lmXzdxA6S70NMpON1zmDXlL71rRp0agucg3YSnntPA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=protonmail.com header.s=protonmail3 header.b=g9SzcIPi; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=quarantine) header.from=protonmail.com ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1724278099; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=aDXXxasuwPhbDwDpY+f4ofL7rs15H9eZ0MYdpOF+8LT5G8AGOYLEfgqkUn03Y/DOOfGuJG 16C7fwV9QCsbHpbyetpt91OOhPWq4cVbYns9JuMK7Mh2O3tXsjOBcHY0XY8ufUIngPFdrs tMDtcXGsVmZw5i2/+IJl8tT/CzfrBbBwhFcxzdKLSBp6YDTS0X8ngem0X+bGJ1QWCYjXW5 vIpW/kipCuP9xbSTK9eKCgASiRouyQVIjL5SWispT+72rl8M6nsH6wt08VkHHNGPJ8bbK1 j58EnzhqqsD6m9kWN13a75TfhDekPG/2TvxPKNU4SfKekuQ/uB6xOpZH0ZQpkA== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89D1D7C0E4 for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2024 00:08:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sgtUG-0004ed-LQ; Wed, 21 Aug 2024 18:07:28 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sgtUE-0004Wy-GG for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Aug 2024 18:07:26 -0400 Received: from mail-40134.protonmail.ch ([185.70.40.134]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sgtUC-0001Td-AZ; Wed, 21 Aug 2024 18:07:26 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail3; t=1724278037; x=1724537237; bh=mo2hGlLBZlPmtGpZziaUFcNN9CknghGICRWF8YTQRCY=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID:BIMI-Selector; b=g9SzcIPi6E60/M4i0S5UR+awfGlcmeGlEmERXnh9q+0FOnTgsw96hj6DJoqPrIzc/ kXlS1tbyr+ulBTdpcnHkUuR+O4AZutgUttzYFh3LIFJDEkj9T5C8D5gHRjB/m3A6TZ wUyE/kMPk2rqydvBhRXpKTlw/zjizACaknBwjSq0AO3zq/9yb2RlidvSbbg7mBP4+h 5POZCf3Kzy9TuzvPCcDlehyD40AsF3Qpar4l+pmUvNVntdD/z6h46wgf57Zb1h3FC9 JwkfMcCqf9/tYQETdFuLU7yOX8MGrFxdxFOEUNGOSNcdzrdCUyb61ncryeZx9EhAMZ yRkix+ekneHcw== Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2024 22:07:08 +0000 To: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= From: Kaelyn Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Subject: =?utf-8?Q?Re:_Merging_=E2=80=98core-updates=E2=80=99_real_soon?= Message-ID: <7VjCrpS6GGJbDw3Hen6wLdVBeSYjgZ-e0wu8n6NuynjzrJhwNPtIBvZP24v2uxnaD4BreEhAnJEYhvfYTwUWjWsAIBoWjYGGOgZY77_2GfE=@protonmail.com> In-Reply-To: <87ikvtppye.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87ikvtppye.fsf@gnu.org> Feedback-ID: 34709329:user:proton X-Pm-Message-ID: 9ec056943fad6ce135b7271d4d1954eb78e00cc7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.70.40.134; envelope-from=kaelyn.alexi@protonmail.com; helo=mail-40134.protonmail.ch X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Spam-Score: -9.90 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 89D1D7C0E4 X-Migadu-Scanner: mx10.migadu.com X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -9.90 X-TUID: 5ablxzSPcqHd On Wednesday, August 21st, 2024 at 1:43 PM, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: >=20 >=20 > Hello Guix! >=20 > I=E2=80=99d like to propose merging =E2=80=98core-updates=E2=80=99 real s= oon, say by next week, > Friday 30th. Woohoo! I look forward to it. My thanks and congratulations to all who help= ed with 'core-updates'! :) >=20 >=20 > But first, this branch started about a year ago (!), and it=E2=80=99s har= d for > someone who=E2=80=99s not following IRC 7 days a week to figure out what = the > status is=E2=80=94something we should definitely improve on. >=20 > An overview in terms of package coverage can be found here: >=20 > https://qa.guix.gnu.org/branch/core-updates >=20 > To view =E2=80=9Cblocking builds=E2=80=9D (packages that fail to build an= d thus =E2=80=9Cblock=E2=80=9D > all those that depend on it), say for i686-linux, see: >=20 > https://data.qa.guix.gnu.org/revision/aab1fe98574e1cd4c7911c1e5571b3733fb= 71d67/blocking-builds?system=3Di686-linux&target=3Dnone&limit_results=3D50 >=20 > or run: >=20 > ./pre-inst-env guix weather -s i686-linux -c 200 >=20 > from a =E2=80=98core-updates=E2=80=99 checkout. This gives an idea where = to focus our > efforts. You can also browse individual ci.guix builds at: >=20 > https://ci.guix.gnu.org/eval/latest/dashboard?spec=3Dcore-updates >=20 > Currently, we=E2=80=99re at ~95% on x86_64-linux, 80=E2=80=9390% on the o= ther *-linux > systems, and ~2% on i586-gnu (GNU/Hurd; that=E2=80=99s more or less where= we > were before.) Note that ci.guix is still struggling with aarch64-linux > build and hasn=E2=80=99t even attempted armhf-linux builds, but bordeaux.= guix is > doing well. >=20 > I=E2=80=99m aware of at least one important issue that prevents use of Gu= ix > System on i686-linux: >=20 > https://issues.guix.gnu.org/72725 >=20 > To me, that=E2=80=99s the last blocker, even though there=E2=80=99s room = for improvement > here and there (for instance, FFmpeg currently fails to build on > i686-linux). My three 'core-updates' patches (which thank you for sprucing the remaining= two up and committing them!) were from me addressing the main build failur= es I encountered while building my system and home configs against core-upd= ates: wine64 and wine64-staging not building due to their dependence on the= 32-bit (i686-linux) wine and wine-staging packages--the three patches fixe= d the wine64 build for me, although building wine-staging (for wine64-stagi= ng) hit the FFmpeg build failure. After two weeks of bisecting, I tracked i= t down to commit 8025d419db which updates binutils from 2.38 to 2.41. I hav= en't figured out how to address the bug but it seems to be from a change be= tween 2.38 and 2.39, as I also found a Gentoo bug report hitting the same F= Fmpeg build error (https://bugs.gentoo.org/893118) and downgraded binutils = to 2.39 to confirm the error is present with that version. Otherwise, IIRC I didn't encounter any other build failures for x86_64-linu= x. Cheers, Kaelyn >=20 > Anything else? >=20 >=20 > A number of people already provided feedback informally after > reconfiguring their systems on =E2=80=98core-updates=E2=80=99. Please sha= re your > experience, positive or negative, here! >=20 > Ludo=E2=80=99.