From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Julien Lepiller Subject: Re: How to build only Guix Manual Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2019 13:33:33 +0200 Message-ID: <7E2F178C-6032-40D6-AEA8-EC66CAC7920E@lepiller.eu> References: <20190902215757.326904a0@sybil.lepiller.eu> <29D826AB-D5B7-4902-80D3-FB9EACCA5CF9@lepiller.eu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53297) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1i5747-0007Rb-0R for help-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Sep 2019 07:33:40 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i5745-0005B2-Pv for help-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Sep 2019 07:33:38 -0400 Received: from lepiller.eu ([2a00:5884:8208::1]:55244) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i5745-0004yB-7k for help-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Sep 2019 07:33:37 -0400 In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Help-Guix" To: Rafael Fontenelle Cc: help-guix@gnu.org Le 3 septembre 2019 13:08:14 GMT+02:00, Rafael Fontenelle a =C3=A9crit : >Em ter, 3 de set de 2019 =C3=A0s 05:16, Julien Lepiller > escreveu: >> >> I don't understand why they are not generated when building >individual info manuals=2E You can build these files with: >> >> make doc/os-config-bare-bones=2Etexi >> ect >> >> Note that we don't provide a way to translate these examples yet, so >you'll have to use the English filename for now, or help us get them >translated :) > >Thanks Julien and Ludovic (in other email) for the replies=2E > >Yep, adding the above command did the job and the build of HTML manual >worked just fine=2E > >Doubt: is it safe to replace @pxref and @xref with @ref? These two >macros prefix an untranslatable "see" and "See", respectively, before >the linked section=2E So I am considering using "veja @ref" and "Veja >@ref" (veja =3D "see" translation) instead=2E Yes, other translators have done that=2E It sometimes issues a warning, bu= t it's generally safe I think=2E