From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: swedebugia <swedebugia@riseup.net>
Subject: bug#33647: First `guix pull' behaves unexpectedly
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2018 06:24:11 +0100
Message-ID: <754f62aa-dd54-4b0e-b78e-052160295af2@riseup.net>
References: <874lbqu2j3.fsf@GlaDOS.home> <87k1km3bn0.fsf@elephly.net>
	<871s6ugsrq.fsf@gnu.org> <87sgz9spgw.fsf@GlaDOS.home>
	<87r2eth3by.fsf@gnu.org> <87y38lu1f6.fsf@GlaDOS.home>
	<aee5ec2d-4812-461c-6ae5-f68d3f69f133@riseup.net> <87woo58ggz.fsf@nckx>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-path: <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56101)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1gZqik-0008K1-Ah
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Dec 2018 00:18:07 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1gZqig-0000sX-CG
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Dec 2018 00:18:06 -0500
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:51102)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1gZqig-0000sT-7a
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Dec 2018 00:18:02 -0500
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1gZqif-0001li-W0
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Dec 2018 00:18:02 -0500
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.33647.B33647.15452830656772@debbugs.gnu.org>
In-Reply-To: <87woo58ggz.fsf@nckx>
Content-Language: en-US
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix/>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "bug-Guix" <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <somebody@not-sent-or-endorsed-by.tobias.gr>
Cc: 33647@debbugs.gnu.org

On 2018-12-19 20:27, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote:
> swedebugia wrote:
>> egil@parabola:~$ time hash pacman
>>
>> real    0m0,000s
>> user    0m0,000s
>> sys    0m0,000s
>>
>> So it won't and any measuable overhead to just call this in the end of
>> guix package after updating the symlinks to the new profile
>> generation.
> 
> Do you mean to put something like
> 
>   guix() {
>     command "$1" "$@"
>     hash "$1"
>   }
> 
> in the default /etc/profile (or wherever such things belong)?
> 
> I think this is far too intrusive and magical to do by default, 
> considering its limited one-time-only usefulness.  The same goes for 
> patching shells.

That sounds like it could work even though it look like an ugly hack. :)

-- 
Cheers Swedebugia