From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Luis_Felipe_L=C3=B3pez_Acevedo?= Subject: Re: Guix Oficial Website Date: Sun, 24 May 2015 21:17:31 -0500 Message-ID: <752bd716ede5bf9ddecf4b8b6493628f@openmailbox.org> References: <871tikwhac.fsf@gnu.org> <20150518154750.GA21553@debian> <20150518185359.GA28949@debian> <87k2w5llea.fsf@gnu.org> <099ff8e74831505651302c2f88e0859d@openmailbox.org> <877fs1zlgg.fsf@gnu.org> <8fcd4e09be4ae158ca1869f05e268a04@openmailbox.org> <877fs0lp08.fsf@gnu.org> <360af973d0d0f6651d2790657f8efb89@openmailbox.org> <874mn2qgic.fsf@openmailbox.org> <9617151f53522f66748e361191ca5575@openmailbox.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44153) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YwhxX-0007JF-50 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 May 2015 22:17:46 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YwhxT-0006VA-4h for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 May 2015 22:17:43 -0400 Received: from smtp22.openmailbox.org ([62.4.1.56]:49557) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YwhxS-0006Uf-Sa for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 May 2015 22:17:39 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.openmailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D29592E01BC for ; Mon, 25 May 2015 04:17:37 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <9617151f53522f66748e361191ca5575@openmailbox.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: =?UTF-8?Q?Luis_Felipe_L=C3=B3pez_Acevedo?= Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On 2015-05-24 17:48, Luis Felipe L=C3=B3pez Acevedo wrote: >=20 > Hi Adam. >=20 > Yes, I'm aware of those. Most of them are because of a missing Doctype > definition on all pages, and because of using XML syntax in > self-closing elements. Part of that is related to the current SXML to > XML conversion method. I meant to say that the pages are missing a Document type declaration,=20 and that SXML to XML renders empty non-self-closing elements as=20 self-closing elements. For example (video (@ (src "http://somevideo.org/video.webm"))) Will be rendered as