From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id qIlXIdJhsF5dMgAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 04 May 2020 18:41:22 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id UMsaM9xhsF6IXAAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 04 May 2020 18:41:32 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142::17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A01A09441B0 for ; Mon, 4 May 2020 18:41:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:57912 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jVg20-0005qj-2S for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 04 May 2020 14:41:32 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39534) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jVg1r-0005qA-Nk for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 May 2020 14:41:23 -0400 Received: from lepiller.eu ([2a00:5884:8208::1]:38546) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jVg1p-0002IT-3X for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 May 2020 14:41:23 -0400 Received: from lepiller.eu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lepiller.eu (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 91e463d6; Mon, 4 May 2020 18:41:16 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=lepiller.eu; h=date :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:subject:to:from:message-id; s=dkim; bh=Vmxaw4rQ+OJzjkyUBcYbpHZZAMyFsttV9r1fyQ/c3rs=; b=mZCAw38A4w0I SHfLfqPqyTaYwVPf3YWgpVuN4Qyk+Xv209g7UPqWXWLxSJc/kKng5lqEu4RUk2Ib ZAdnYZFfso9vnr2gGTEOmx4wVEpGaE2CREmdiwJG+7kZBhLX0EO615hDoHwdDKiO ETR9f0Be36RPCa7VDv86V59rHEIqdvp+7r2U40RPgX4BA47Ks9wsljo0309J84fS eG6J9brT8m2PMQLlSdvgU4tCcqzua+N3d2MzJwOv3myzA+bahqYQlRfHm7DDG9LG a10AjW7zxj0Z3y2gFTUixhxSoNrndY+t2VcExjhaQ4Y+k8ubi/xzak2TWd+BT/H3 1THN8jhiFA== Received: by lepiller.eu (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 8589a29f (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Mon, 4 May 2020 18:41:15 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 04 May 2020 14:40:54 -0400 User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: Reference by biblatex-software exporting? To: guix-devel@gnu.org,zimoun From: Julien Lepiller Message-ID: <7403BB7C-0264-4EBA-AE2D-9C705D18DEC9@lepiller.eu> Received-SPF: none client-ip=2a00:5884:8208::1; envelope-from=julien@lepiller.eu; helo=lepiller.eu X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Scanner: scn0 X-Spam-Score: -0.71 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=lepiller.eu header.s=dkim header.b=mZCAw38A; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=lepiller.eu; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 2001:470:142::17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Scan-Result: default: False [-0.71 / 13.00]; GENERIC_REPUTATION(0.00)[-0.49502508981607]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2001:470:142::/48:c]; IP_REPUTATION_HAM(0.00)[asn: 22989(0.13), country: US(-0.00), ip: 2001:470:142::17(-0.50)]; DWL_DNSWL_BLOCKED(0.00)[lepiller.eu:dkim,2001:470:142::17:from]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[lepiller.eu:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[lepiller.eu,none]; MX_GOOD(-0.50)[cached: eggs.gnu.org]; MAILLIST(-0.20)[mailman]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gnu.org,gmail.com]; FORGED_RECIPIENTS_MAILLIST(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:22989, ipnet:2001:470:142::/48, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[larch=yhetil.org]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[lepiller.eu:s=dkim]; RCVD_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; URIBL_BLOCKED(0.00)[ctan.org:url,lepiller.eu:dkim]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[julien@lepiller.eu,guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; HAS_LIST_UNSUB(-0.01)[]; DNSWL_BLOCKED(0.00)[2001:470:142::17:from]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; FORGED_SENDER_MAILLIST(0.00)[] X-TUID: uWYTvvc9cBtd Le 4 mai 2020 12:35:40 GMT-04:00, zimoun a = =C3=A9crit : >Dear, > >Referencing software is now a key point in Scientific publications=2E >INRIA and Software Heritage propose this BibTeX format [1]=2E One first >question is: is it french specific? i=2Ee=2E, other scientific communitie= s >have proposed similar? > >[1] >https://www=2Ectan=2Eorg/tex-archive/macros/latex/contrib/biblatex-contri= b/biblatex-software > > >I would like to be able to do: guix show hello --format=3Dbiblatex and >then obtain one almost ready BibTeX entry=2E >And I like to be able to do: guix describe -f biblatex and then obtain >the relevant information to cite in a paper=2E > >Because it is very "scientific" specific, does it make sense to >include such feature? > > >All the best, >simon > >ps: >Discussing recently the output format of packages, especially the >command 'search' and 'show', I am in the process to propose in >addition to the 'package->recutils' procedure, other formats such as >'package->json' or 'package->oneline'=2E Well, that's another story=2E >:-) I'm not sure if that's the package I use implicitely or if it's something = else, but I can cite software with @software entries in bibtex=2E I think t= hat's a really nice idea, and having multiple formats to choose from would = be cool=2E I don't think that having a format that only scientists would us= e is an issue, as a good part of our audience is in the scientific communit= y anyway=2E As long as it's not the default, it wouldn't bother other users= =2E Exciting :)