From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Pimentel Subject: Re: [ART] Logo proposal Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 08:55:29 -0300 Message-ID: <739777d03b8fe3cdd41cf023f867702e@openmailbox.org> References: <1423405549.2120.7.camel@openmailbox.org> <87k2zqaf2g.fsf@gnu.org> <1423579572.2236.22.camel@openmailbox.org> <874mqsuoqi.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33378) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YLsMz-00086w-S8 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 06:55:49 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YLsMy-0000Bt-Iw for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 06:55:45 -0500 In-Reply-To: <874mqsuoqi.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: ludo@gnu.org Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, guix-devel-bounces+d4n1=opmbx.org@gnu.org On 2015-02-11 18:23, ludo@gnu.org wrote: > Luis Felipe L=C3=B3pez Acevedo skribis: >=20 >> What worries me about staying close to the GNU branding is that it=20 >> could >> create the confusion RMS wants to avoid (people thinking that GuixSD=20 >> is >> *the* GNU OS and GNU's head its logo). He even suggested having a logo >> for Guix and GuixSD [1][2]. So I think it would be better to play it >> safe and avoid any conflict within the GNU Project. We can still >> emphasise the close relationship between GuixSD and the GNU Project,=20 >> and >> hence the proposal of a wildebeest head as the logo for GuixSD too. >=20 > Yes, makes sense. >=20 > So, let=E2=80=99s use this GuixSD logo! >=20 > To begin with, I think we could use it in the GRUB and/or SLiM > backgrounds. WDYT? >=20 > Then we=E2=80=99ll want to use it on the web site somehow, but the curr= ent > =E2=80=9Csite=E2=80=9D is really just one page, and it would seem odd t= o have the two > logos upfront on the same page. >=20 > Thus, the first step would be to come up with a multi-page site (yay!) > and with appropriate style. That probably means departing from the > gnu.org style sheets and server-side includes. This is not an ideal > solution, but it easier than trying to adjust all of gnu.org to meet=20 > our > needs. I would hope that whoever takes up this task communicates with > the gnu.org webmasters in an effort to collaborate in the longer run. >=20 > Thoughts? Volunteers? >=20 > Lastly, I=E2=80=99m not sure what to do about the main Guix logo. On o= ne hand=20 > I > like the one you propose, but on the other I=E2=80=99m a bit reluctant = to > change. >=20 > Thanks again! >=20 > Ludo=E2=80=99. I like Guix logo (I did sticker and paste in my computers :) and I think=20 that should not change, but maybe to GuixSD could change or not. I like=20 for idea to universal Guix logo to "package manager" and "OS". What do=20 you think about name GuixOS? Thanks, --=20 Daniel Pimentel (d4n1)