From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hartmut Goebel Subject: Re: Inconsistency between "guix system" and "guix package" Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2017 20:56:36 +0200 Message-ID: <720f0476-326c-446f-7084-0c94aab37aa9@crazy-compilers.com> References: <87shf21vpj.fsf@gmail.com> <87fub1pq4p.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42142) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dz5tX-0005Po-5Y for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Oct 2017 14:56:47 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dz5tT-0006aj-26 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Oct 2017 14:56:47 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87fub1pq4p.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Language: en-US List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: =?UTF-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=c3=a8s?= , Alex Kost Cc: guix-devel Am 02.10.2017 um 16:43 schrieb Ludovic Court=C3=A8s: > So we cannot just have =E2=80=9Cguix package install=E2=80=9D or =E2=80= =9Cguix package remove=E2=80=9D. > > Thoughts? use the dashes in "guix system", too: guix system --roll-back --=20 Regards Hartmut Goebel | Hartmut Goebel | h.goebel@crazy-compilers.com | | www.crazy-compilers.com | compilers which you thought are impossible |