From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: swedebugia Subject: Re: Come back and graphical installer Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 15:55:34 +0100 Message-ID: <715e7107-e119-de4f-94c1-ef602af475c6@riseup.net> References: <87lg6sejwa.fsf@gmail.com> <87wopd88hq.fsf@gmail.com> <0cae2c12-49f9-3a7d-dba2-3cc8a9558859@freenet.de> <87h8gdq0li.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36655) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gPTp0-0003qu-QD for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 09:49:43 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gPTox-0000On-KV for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 09:49:42 -0500 Received: from mx1.riseup.net ([198.252.153.129]:34720) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gPTox-0000Mw-Bi for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 09:49:39 -0500 Received: from piha.riseup.net (piha-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.163]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60B4C1A0CA1 for ; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 06:49:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by piha.riseup.net with ESMTPSA id C4E9668134 for ; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 06:49:37 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87h8gdq0li.fsf@gmail.com> Content-Language: sv-FI List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: guix-devel@gnu.org Hi :) On 2018-11-19 03:10, Mathieu Othacehe wrote: > > Hi Thorsten, snip >> >> "Keyboard model selection": >> >> Hmm, Ubuntu's graphical installer gets away with just layout and >> variant, no mention of model. Some graphical installers have a test >> box and/or a detection scheme (asking the user to press certain keys). > > Well now "pc105" is the standard and other models are mostly relics from > the past. I think I'll just assume the model to be pc105 and let user > select a layout and variant then. Sounds good. The manual install is for all the special weird cases. snip > >> "User selection": >> >> This could start right in "User creation" for the first, required >> user. Actually, I wonder if the installer should even offer creation >> of several users? In general, don't do what can easily be done after >> installation. > > Well I was hesitating too as multiple user adds complexity to the > form. What do other people think, one or multiple users selection :)? Single user is preferred. You can hide al the group name and stuff too and just focus on the username. Ubuntu makes it possible to choose a hostname. I never used that to anything so I would just set it to the username or just "guixsd". -- Cheers Swedebugia