From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: swedebugia Subject: Re: Help needed fixing linux-libre-5.2 on aarch64 Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2019 14:48:07 +0200 Message-ID: <6eef66ff-69a3-1601-0ac7-5c7affea04d2@riseup.net> References: <87muhieh3e.fsf@netris.org> <87k1ck27wb.fsf@gmx.com> <87ims4249j.fsf@gmx.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53292) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hmdvJ-0001cE-6y for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Jul 2019 08:48:13 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hmdvI-0008Bk-Bv for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Jul 2019 08:48:13 -0400 Received: from mx1.riseup.net ([198.252.153.129]:56556) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hmdvG-00089q-Nj for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Jul 2019 08:48:10 -0400 Received: from bell.riseup.net (bell-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.178]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA4B11A09B7 for ; Sun, 14 Jul 2019 05:48:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bell.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6C8332221B4 for ; Sun, 14 Jul 2019 05:48:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87ims4249j.fsf@gmx.com> Content-Language: en-US List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: guix-devel@gnu.org On 2019-07-14 14:24, Pierre Langlois wrote: > >> And if I remove it then the error goes away! The build hasn't finished >> yet for me, but it's gone past the offending xor-neon.c file so we >> /should/ be good. >> >> I'm not really sure why though, do you know why this phase was required >> at the time? I haven't tested that linux-libre still builds on x86 with >> this phase removed yet, trying it now. > > OK, I've now built kernels with the attached patch on the kernel-updates > branch for x86_64 and aarch64! I've also tested with > --system=armhf-linux on the softiron and --system=i868-linux on my x86 > desktop, it all looks good! Nice work! -- Cheers Swedebugia