From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id KAtuGFFbIWBaUAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 08 Feb 2021 15:40:01 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id mNMqFFFbIWDJTQAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 08 Feb 2021 15:40:01 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F04519402A2 for ; Mon, 8 Feb 2021 15:40:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:43162 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l98dr-0004m2-SN for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2021 10:39:59 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38342) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l92FL-0004D1-CL for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2021 03:50:17 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:38226) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l92F7-0007M1-Qa for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2021 03:50:05 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l92F7-0002A8-NN for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2021 03:50:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#46277] [PATCH v4 2/2] gnu: Add fwupd. Resent-From: Jonathan Brielmaier Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2021 08:50:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46277 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: =?UTF-8?Q?L=C3=A9o?= Le Bouter , 46277@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 46277-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46277.16127741688267 (code B ref 46277); Mon, 08 Feb 2021 08:50:01 +0000 Received: (at 46277) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Feb 2021 08:49:28 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49772 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l92EZ-00029H-P4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2021 03:49:27 -0500 Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.3]:40055) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l92EX-000292-Oj for 46277@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2021 03:49:26 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=web.de; s=dbaedf251592; t=1612774158; bh=G1YZz/OA9qzufr1rwAKJ62lvT61mc9LtRVH6yvZ4mOQ=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=j4R+hfvk486XE6EpCOwhVuRU5UfdSx0KVIN4YE4ouJsp52e74+cjf5bZHtBYoYV0U KKNdC4EySuBL/v2ZViHEQxSaJVhSv2hRvFNWWoWUbvReqluQfe9QHElfPLBNO87hs4 4XZlkH9/nZAcTyNzAX6sjz6TRrNbeuNGQX78aQ2k= X-UI-Sender-Class: c548c8c5-30a9-4db5-a2e7-cb6cb037b8f9 Received: from [192.168.178.88] ([5.146.192.196]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb003 [213.165.67.108]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LopdT-1lpUWb2sqx-00gq8i; Mon, 08 Feb 2021 09:49:18 +0100 References: <3389e080-707e-7b83-a3d3-dfd2da7be60c@web.de> <20210206004821.25915-1-lle-bout@zaclys.net> <20210206004821.25915-3-lle-bout@zaclys.net> From: Jonathan Brielmaier Message-ID: <6ced3071-0b1e-9807-141c-c2a3c4e08445@web.de> Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2021 09:49:17 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/78.6.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210206004821.25915-3-lle-bout@zaclys.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:iIJH63GEn1nS3NJGc3mXFs4eZLpDGIhrm+w3Vh/6jq7zSQujuLY SJWo80adB300IyRCePcl3mHELbrxOpgAF9/VsymSGy5cWKh+NTUhBUi6+tEy2VX4DiHGAvR xV/t4yhxZEWJjxb9jXU7cv328VEsKBAm1hE6/jWIvaS8F+avFvNU/3lmuoOLi1UXPBHVBd/ h/dWKBQzcYe9N9SrDLshg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:4XD9nPn5U3Q=:GRbGIuy1aF7OgRkks8NDjf EnNfc2q5esjzakkWPfkvzKjmYuNiAumPd4RgDOc3ZHcsAvbDhbq2yXJcO9HdCjgtKDcN4HkQR Ou/0cPlayFHu2GX5ELhgPei31PuVeMdzsdW8xalW3+53v2QvJM8JIOFtzbyx6cDWnCg64J+8u 1tPyUYPv+CPxX5vdeOAJhqq5mNdI0Y1Ab9co6AM2ajjrj/51xTy4NKlbebr812p/wVDHPEU3S 0uKptKiJfi2PYELzlcAX27a4ltdkZwACL7AX8qRUmhL4YuU8cpDn0Z/4QxFuWu3AeDJxNjE/G HuLldZJeiY3gHseJ2G1FU0to9M1nTNHg4rNbF9tcSQc4Bde4N7r7kEFR5Ro9cFehwdkdbflZa f8qyzxPsiwpVPz6jwR/Hkcpbvv4zlNxlywqSNiloOxw/PTIGVdmNVtP6wKLbNA2gQFI4aK1tY 6z38PJfnkQrD+SWXAcrFpUmIRlyXtSdh2oeNnSNU7toIOZJlSlMvkcjfUY0BtDVGzxRcSoO0t uLKFFI4o6xKAQAXpvONCjURJhAvnCpxXtn2feNSiWenVlSnTjwqzUQZa0sLRnQvEistfwtuOu CHhVlcaLOCDpsAjpDOXciXql2j8xU3IxQ/G9mZUM91kivIyADpt24zRULBLBQBjTTFZo8ndwz dNCmz8Fl8oUHwgt5Iame2bjQgGju5ji/GYO7+O6QZays22+uNqMG1vuVD/mNZ0qOm+/uEcf7c wV5jMuMt4D0h8GDFPbbpVnwAiZRKcjX6JUAOHNiM+Ug0yoJ2d8uYlYFljFQm2kl1RtN7ZaZEI uowhEWuxxPuVzpzKRxaIsEebzgfrWHKA8ueb2khW4Hvdieyg4Xvgrtsq5QKd99EUmWY/RwJ2c sW/chBEjB4csbOZvW7eBbS0FrphaYEXOwEcL0zhaU= X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -1.26 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=web.de header.s=dbaedf251592 header.b=j4R+hfvk; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=web.de (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: F04519402A2 X-Spam-Score: -1.26 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: gwVREoebYpYU On 06.02.21 01:48, L=C3=A9o Le Bouter via Guix-patches via wrote: > ...d-option-for-installation-sysconfdir.patch | 152 ++++++++++++++++++ I think you should mention that this patch is coming from NixOS: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/nixos-20.09/pkgs/os-specific/linux/f= irmware/fwupd/add-option-for-installation-sysconfdir.patch Further we should think about bringing this patch functionality to upstream as there are two downstream users already...