From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp10.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms5.migadu.com with LMTPS id 8K4RE30WQmMaMAAAbAwnHQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 09 Oct 2022 02:31:57 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp10.migadu.com with LMTPS id QI49En0WQmMyEgEAG6o9tA (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 09 Oct 2022 02:31:57 +0200 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1443FC687 for ; Sun, 9 Oct 2022 02:31:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:60140 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ohKEW-0001Vv-8l for larch@yhetil.org; Sat, 08 Oct 2022 20:31:56 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42800) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ohKEM-0001Vi-57 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Oct 2022 20:31:46 -0400 Received: from mx1.dismail.de ([78.46.223.134]:13699) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ohKEK-0005xd-PE for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Oct 2022 20:31:45 -0400 Received: from mx1.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 2751db12; Sun, 9 Oct 2022 02:31:42 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=dismail.de; h= mime-version:date:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:from :message-id:subject:to:in-reply-to:references; s=20190914; bh=yw tX3U3APtC9iUf+K+kDnUTCGifvenHGF9lJ7cm2fls=; b=QRyI51aPmNA3mDsPky GeES2NcnMntTTxUtwGcg9zL9SR31AM6TT7b5c/gyzqXI7+Fcr4nq05o5BrA8L+bO ZsD0Ts0X6dNuUDUt99MqMSf0Nm2ahu4Scn2aCPg2fpjsxnerXp4KOVSiSW68exPd hDiccm2qEUf0VX6ncHbAIV130N1aZOBmscjsj/tAdgDwCU4wGp3i4O7adIyXopeD WnQ67lnE23kYjZ5zjRnrv2Ie2nwTskvQCVtxhp+I/Nt970tk23L1iqt/ZuXS6rB8 LgfjIZv6bY8k9HMMxaKh4YbX6vlUe5lE0kbBvuSyGC0I70LYmcdXDDSmMLmRvbe7 /4QQ== Received: from smtp1.dismail.de ( [10.240.26.11]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id f2ea6228; Sun, 9 Oct 2022 02:31:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp1.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 9aca95ae; Sun, 9 Oct 2022 02:31:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: by dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 47a1b895 (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO); Sun, 9 Oct 2022 02:31:41 +0200 (CEST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2022 00:31:41 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: RainLoop/1.16.0a From: jbranso@dismail.de Message-ID: <6c9dd8f3a1d10bafb9c247e52cfe3a68@dismail.de> Subject: Re: Why linux-libre-bpf? To: "kiasoc5" , guix-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20221009001742.153f936c@aria> References: <20221009001742.153f936c@aria> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=78.46.223.134; envelope-from=jbranso@dismail.de; helo=mx1.dismail.de X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1665275517; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=0MkUmgvE6JctOK1V2mCFF01cWrpUIhBsobe+aJqmfyA=; b=BGotOU7FHQbG2+kaLlqoqomNCNzJgSmda/dCSZtmTKI4Q+gJc0ghEH9s5MbQ5E9OK88s35 Eimi46+0+oqv89+ZKG3T0L3D0O7VCoQ3Eq4EF9vYW7XOV0+Enr7/IKkv8RRZzLyscqoNPa kyhCLxX/N7OltIXSr4KfeoplKbKrRidt2asFVNofNxw3HpqA0SBDLIW0G7U8BZdnABW1a5 OChWjxVcMAWD/6zw51ilfLlxNzlEu9bC3voX4G3B+9a58SPxSpn8ibjRej3KUBAhO8JztZ DVdjB/tmZQb+IQhYxyped5k/x5mK7IMZSGxhgPiibhJBvGLtpUf6mtLLgLDHGg== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1665275517; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=OPx3PBu1ErprZ3EyY6RwyLBQvtegCXlkEYTt9bzjkqEhg4LotHMzKSpG+8X8KxQYeGhGnG gF1QB4rUkukTdq1lBeNlAQg7w/SD9PxC8Rllv5oZZNXjo9E6YZ4zuIG5l1eVuM7gjZiGst IqYFXjNo4UotO8ytserG1m/FrAsBuy5VDIZ4Yft0Uz5TkEdwQ/BTUsHCv5iuUG43bSiK7K cal8BK5INkuPkfOKaKTKARLYIfcvr/nn5rKoxfa6ZHKVp7TVBchKBL0aLvr1Cse0PLHSK6 npde1ftd05n4r/7NTGL7wMNglxDOBqd2n6mSi0Y2q3tWsCETyppKCnwrccwVeg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=dismail.de header.s=20190914 header.b=QRyI51aP; dmarc=pass (policy=reject) header.from=dismail.de; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.49 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=dismail.de header.s=20190914 header.b=QRyI51aP; dmarc=pass (policy=reject) header.from=dismail.de; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 1443FC687 X-Spam-Score: -2.49 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: R3GGv746Dgzo October 8, 2022 8:18 PM, "kiasoc5" wrote: > AFAIK Guix is the only distro with a separate kernel (linux-libre-bpf) > that has the following turned on: >=20 >=20CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON=3Dy > CONFIG_BPF_JIT=3Dy >=20 >=20Why is this not the default in regular linux-libre? >=20 I=20just did a quick internet search for the ebpf vulnerabilities. A few came up. Maybe it's a security feature. :) > --