From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ben Woodcroft Subject: Re: Cross-distro reproducible build patches Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2017 11:16:25 +1000 Message-ID: <6b109adb-e35d-8875-fe59-983a06b5156f@uq.edu.au> References: <87mvf5x4n3.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35975) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cPJ92-0005XZ-0I for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2017 20:16:37 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cPJ8y-0004UT-Q3 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2017 20:16:35 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87mvf5x4n3.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: =?UTF-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=c3=a8s?= , guix-devel Hi, On 05/01/17 19:00, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > Hello Guix! > > A new initiative to share repro-build patches has started as a followup > to the Reproducible Build Summit: > > http://lists.reproducible-builds.org/pipermail/rb-general/2017-Janua= ry/000222.html > https://github.com/distropatches/reproducible-builds Cool. [...] > =E2=80=A6 but I think a number things are written as snippets rather th= an actual > patches. Indeed, for instance, I just came some of these for cd-hit while=20 updating it. Do you think it makes sense to convert these to patches=20 where possible so that they can be shared? Thanks, ben