From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp10.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id 0LWxMehqBGLHeQEAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2022 02:31:20 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp10.migadu.com with LMTPS id mDtmKuhqBGI9TQAAG6o9tA (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2022 02:31:20 +0100 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33827381D4 for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2022 02:31:20 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1]:42220 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nHyIo-00058c-Dy for larch@yhetil.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2022 20:31:18 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:55918) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nHyIY-00056a-1h for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2022 20:31:02 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:59244) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nHyIX-0000lG-Nj for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2022 20:31:01 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nHyIX-0003qe-K3 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2022 20:31:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#53878] [RFC PATCH 8/9] gnu: Add chez-scheme-racket-variant. Resent-From: Philip McGrath Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 01:31:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 53878 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Liliana Marie Prikler , 53878@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 53878-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B53878.164445661814734 (code B ref 53878); Thu, 10 Feb 2022 01:31:01 +0000 Received: (at 53878) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Feb 2022 01:30:18 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53141 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nHyHq-0003pZ-3Q for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2022 20:30:18 -0500 Received: from mail-qk1-f174.google.com ([209.85.222.174]:42965) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nHyHn-0003pF-MF for 53878@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2022 20:30:16 -0500 Received: by mail-qk1-f174.google.com with SMTP id m25so3393726qka.9 for <53878@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 09 Feb 2022 17:30:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=philipmcgrath.com; s=google; h=message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject:content-language:to :references:from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=+VwT6RDEpfdOgZ8/GOKiEAd/j/yBv/FctREh/SzIGOY=; b=hXlufIIrdSjWwju8iK/k950+q+hXQft28O+6aiV/qsPMGS1DjNTH3bNW1NZi3I8IXp TSB7aQUAKA3yirpEMNHgjzq/2vfQwvfb2G1R4owF8G1xuGD35xoKZ9f3d31I1xSm3a6R q7NwbIf3J58aAq5RpmqG6yVc1zHArUVjZy01b2j5e8DF8xkkbM4j2AreNDRgPzXquSs4 wzs/DO9bc2VI1cNZwYoVOhTOVR5cL/hr/Bw3SZAW8rwuiTz9k+ZGOZte6BVvjjcSsyHP qabV/qTMmA4SmJ4ShIZ0kepnUBq/q+ul4rmg5Pse6zq8mepiD/wRapGGy95jhkWBeLA0 3y0Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=+VwT6RDEpfdOgZ8/GOKiEAd/j/yBv/FctREh/SzIGOY=; b=3CYo0I9my7CCkfxdks5tlLXjBCU9cA7i9luJFBByU0ZMRMz+q2MHcizXUxtpjfdeEr r/uAgEdbvd/8yEoSo6VWdzO7vZOYFNuJm/GHtlYycKH2iHp5rZGVfnInxlRkFLBlAP/Q 08FLrveOPs+rEjL0ochtjV58/HGPgJBbQmJzrNrH4FGBbnPrXq+gqzhbtKsZ4rCEpcz3 6f0R0X98ZXXgjTccImFZd2KmzJfft8iWR93Ez2Qx5CVw7C+VmzKd1fk2qqG02k9KAzeU fqbxjtUsG9Mpe4nwDo5S9tth0EJD5Af3pV9yN3mZWO5vFBx2UGT14AwdKyJRnwsWmtSn dzdQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532hZy0gp/1jK62RAPvGrqgIGsm//UmxZ3STwp/wDN4LWoqaPGfQ Js4p6sBL+Zk7eLSKXJoZcp5DGO8r8QpWPronFGI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwmKogi17f2zW9Ef29jmi+sm8p7wfkqC5Bm5l7xZbzlpdntjczrmyTo8slDcMG62JChfMl4ww== X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:2a05:: with SMTP id o5mr2681617qkp.447.1644456610157; Wed, 09 Feb 2022 17:30:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.45.36] (c-73-125-98-51.hsd1.fl.comcast.net. [73.125.98.51]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m130sm8977731qke.55.2022.02.09.17.30.09 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 09 Feb 2022 17:30:09 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <6abafa84-4f63-2bf0-4464-9c7742798902@philipmcgrath.com> Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2022 20:30:08 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.5.0 Content-Language: en-US References: <20220208151316.1897345-1-philip@philipmcgrath.com> <20220208151857.1900389-1-philip@philipmcgrath.com> <20220208151857.1900389-8-philip@philipmcgrath.com> <769cda9ec17a152dc999592827759234436da712.camel@ist.tugraz.at> From: Philip McGrath In-Reply-To: <769cda9ec17a152dc999592827759234436da712.camel@ist.tugraz.at> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1644456680; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=+VwT6RDEpfdOgZ8/GOKiEAd/j/yBv/FctREh/SzIGOY=; b=jgvvLlgHHJnni3a3RptARH7x3sOPgh4mwkM6gDOAGVOLM98nl5078ULAJIFKQNxkBzQAtM DKRJj52KKIXx0x6DrhTwjoqz5xHjfWvWn2oKjTtKSw2xDFN/FJoOUKKmfpiXyd5gcUahgV 37md+Q9LS/Pzu8FZCmSnvt/gxacFDS06AQzj75F3ebtg9P3ZTV5UdFwCc8SN5xgjCZ/Nry 4FxuTc+/TmyO/CnxqtZcIxGufeSERwO/mqpe8WBuKFaKyhVKpH6E2E+SLdh8K95HG8oC5A ThtyxhzQAgFpREnOhbmuFtEuApruxlCj6YsTp1r9cPba2zJqnoZVVIhzA6++Cg== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1644456680; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=hRCRylIrLFGxcQ7de+meewRVWHRDUwjaawgdXn/ySnLTIMq3hAWPIGd9vFn6l53FeeMOum glp0au/CkzQ+t41I6goGY6JVw4bE0+9fls6JEs69ZrmowHa05HOWOnEPMg85wHZPPqcoxg Zppw4x6QflMyeJEP4GJhL9jUb4thS/XQ73UpeIJWO4XgsaGlwhSIq7yUF8yIi1sIL9R13O SxRljRMTmuZ4iuLenpXUXJIFh1i+AhX9rmuDYvpszTwRNE85L9NAUK4T+gWK5DexTkYnhJ 89MAE2Tkn8+hn3IVYY40ZiP+WrVO3lYoPHDCbqV/1a8wIfDgN5Da5mo1zDxk3w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=philipmcgrath.com header.s=google header.b=hXlufIIr; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.13 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=philipmcgrath.com header.s=google header.b=hXlufIIr; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 33827381D4 X-Spam-Score: -2.13 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: fQlyJlBX5Y51 Hi, On 2/9/22 08:42, Liliana Marie Prikler wrote: > Am Dienstag, dem 08.02.2022 um 10:18 -0500 schrieb Philip McGrath: > This patch does a lot and should probably be separated into several > commits. As far as the name "chez-scheme-racket-variant" is concerned, > I am not really a fan of it. How would "chez-scheme-for-racket" sound? > Thanks for taking a look! Calling it "chez-scheme-for-racket" is fine with me---it's a little shorter, at least. As far as splitting it up, yes, that makes sense. (There had at one point been some entanglements that I thought would make that difficult, but I've since fixed all those issues anyway.) What do you think of splitting it like this? >> * gnu/packages/patches/racket-enable-scheme-backport.patch: New >> patch. >> * gnu/local.mk (dist_patch_DATA): Add it. >> * gnu/packages/chez-and-racket-bootstrap.scm (racket-vm-cgc): --- >> (racket-vm-bc): --- >> (racket-vm-cs): --- >> (chez-scheme-racket-variant-bootstrap-bootfiles): >> (chez-scheme-racket-variant): New variables. --- >> (chez-scheme-for-system, --- >> (chez-mit)[origin]: Add workaround for Racket variant. --- >> * gnu/packages/loko.scm (loko-scheme): Use 'chez-scheme-for-system'. >> * gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm (emacs-geiser-chez): Likewise >> * gnu/packages/chez.scm (chez-srfi): >> (chez-web): >> (chez-sockets): >> (chez-matchable): >> (chez-irregex): >> (chez-fmt): >> (chez-mit): >> (chez-scmutils): Likewise. --- >> racket-vm-for-system): New exported >> functions. Alternatively, I could see adding the snippet to "chez-mit" in the same commit as changing it to use "chez-scheme-for-system", or I could split each changed package into its own commit (though those would be extremely small), or put the definition of "chez-scheme-for-system" together with its uses, or ... Racket 8.4 was just released,[0] so I plan to send a revised series today or tomorrow. -Philip [0]: https://blog.racket-lang.org/2022/02/racket-v8-4.html