From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Pimentel Subject: Re: Netpbm Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 20:47:26 -0300 Message-ID: <6ab01a2871c54159908470603e187dda@openmailbox.org> References: <20150125210125.GA1913@debian> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41216) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YFWtz-0004RW-CC for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 18:47:36 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YFWty-0000iv-LB for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 18:47:35 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20150125210125.GA1913@debian> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Andreas Enge Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, guix-devel-bounces+d4n1=opmbx.org@gnu.org On 2015-01-25 18:01, Andreas Enge wrote: > I just went back to our previous netpbm version, as the newest one > fails > one test. Apparently I committed a change instead of stashing it, so I > did not test it correctly locally. Sorry for the mess! > > Andreas Netpbm work now :) Thanks, -- Daniel Pimentel (d4n1)