From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id aCbCGF4hUmEflQAAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 21:54:06 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id 8GRBFF4hUmETXQAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 19:54:06 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB804CC68 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 21:54:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:43570 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mUwhQ-0005Yd-DR for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 15:54:04 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60924) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mUwZf-0002pQ-Jb for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 15:46:04 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:59602) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mUwZe-0005CN-Bg for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 15:46:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mUwZe-0002a1-9h for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 15:46:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#50838] Update sbcl Resent-From: Charles Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2021 19:46:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 50838 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Guillaume Le Vaillant Cc: 50838@debbugs.gnu.org, Pierre Neidhardt Received: via spool by 50838-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B50838.16327719519896 (code B ref 50838); Mon, 27 Sep 2021 19:46:02 +0000 Received: (at 50838) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Sep 2021 19:45:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42915 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mUwZS-0002ZY-Ow for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 15:45:50 -0400 Received: from mail-4325.protonmail.ch ([185.70.43.25]:63469) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mUwZQ-0002ZL-Qy for 50838@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 15:45:49 -0400 Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2021 19:45:39 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail; t=1632771941; bh=E426GP1LhBdLaEBJ4ZRuKmG2JrzVdFNQ3IOubNG9I54=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Reply-To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=PM+2DXspWJhn7vTPxRzlmSJMchu+WzaMyLgl9MK56WFVYj/9/5Ff5YG/eu4uz5077 nOqWpQpaZXo3sCjcn8DgB1A3lNA7pv/xJew9+rnVM+OOwovdDYdXjTPDeTL4uj19yO edPoOYOS3H+rs/Pj/WUONvc7ypylRnXhuCIj2N8w= Message-ID: <6MX54YemJ-AGcuLSj62jQBOdU2WxXszXgHBDPRulsoX2FoxzEbRYkUh51n6r7uj-8UIGHqi_btoQ6NOiRamWkM0zevhOLA36pvM3-s7-PRU=@protonmail.com> In-Reply-To: <87tui6gpay.fsf@kitej> References: <87tui6gpay.fsf@kitej> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" Reply-to: Charles X-ACL-Warn: , Charles via Guix-patches From: Charles via Guix-patches via X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1632772445; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=E426GP1LhBdLaEBJ4ZRuKmG2JrzVdFNQ3IOubNG9I54=; b=iRlQGnmTlz1CsAI9NNRrNGwPuAN3xvGPxz3SNCKntWVHouTCiJm6lsYd4RdxIFdRaObnx2 HTzgokt58vOqgjnWEyV0Vexi4mgGaE+3vhNZ7sZ9GHDy5Dsh57ETtDHEeEVYJz0KYk2eK0 Pbxc7KdyG2BK8hTEQvvw70YngODffzzGmR3trATNAHcwH9aZeQEFs4QFFCs3ho1a3GNSta J7xB7iWySLwTygP7cRGkAvs3DBNF0v3QGp/dhnFXdu0znIBfa6UdgTg7HhYUj5CcCoL/FG rTeyglsUI/AGnN3VgGleeX6lBh3Mh0YE1qa/KocEt7HM8F8uuKQYBaH9HH+Qrg== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1632772445; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=Vk00HnPBEiq9fdy/3oOMgwRO7FGnbI8YV61TPlDB6QOoZNt1cqJvkvYWgLfz1dXuIGBmsm 73sdnoCD1jN3kuCmH4IgPeIUTEV1J8f6x1/i1ylLATaYd/3A4nLdZ/Sl+W5Kvq6h5nzsJ+ E9EqpQmucpYTfFKZNrDhuTkeK73iBjCLQdxvKpbZHcBYW9/WIW3PuhQ64wwlZpSM4dgbRj cr1kzaOEcSrPbwOKZOATW7aIbHS86hzDG6VW60D0lD9krxdXe3NvQXpdz5ee5mOb/VShnc klUwp6KJTEHYDbH2RCfh/pnnBbXfX5rb7lndaHopQgzqCZmJTQ5W51w3g6EfGA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=protonmail.com header.s=protonmail header.b=PM+2DXsp; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.89 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=protonmail.com header.s=protonmail header.b=PM+2DXsp; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: AB804CC68 X-Spam-Score: -2.89 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: 40Adxg/UBcjv I built all sbcl-* packages, I used this snippet to build them; let me know= if there is a better way. ./pre-inst-env guix build $(./pre-inst-env guix search "^name: sbcl-" | awk= '{ print $2 }' | tr '\n' ' ') sbcl-burgled-batteries3 fails to build. It also fails on sbcl 2.1.6. Perhap= s people are not really using the sbcl version of this package and just usi= ng the ecl version as it builds fine. I'm not sure how the build system wor= ks for cl- packages, but apparently it uses sbcl too. Same story with sbcl-png. These are the only two offenders; all other packages built fine. =E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90 Original Me= ssage =E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90 On Monday, September 27th, 2021 at 7:32 AM, Guillaume Le Vaillant wrote: > Hi, > > Some time ago when Pierre Neidhardt tried to update SBCL to 2.1.7, some > > packages failed to compile (because of changes in the internals of SBCL > > I think). See commits b07581d6e24bf5fa4676bcebaba75315bbbb01e6 and > > 7c6ace67bb8ef421965e3f1cc1a02caf54c813f5. > > Did you try building all the sbcl-* packages with SBCL 2.1.8 to check if > > everything works fine? > > If some packages are failing, we will have to update them as well > > (upstreams probably have commits or PRs to fix compatibility with newer > > SBCL versions).