From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kei Kebreau Subject: Re: 'core-updates' Q4 2019 Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2019 20:16:56 -0500 Message-ID: <643852014aa4eef01e71101df64b2ee85e141719.camel@posteo.net> References: <878sprf1zk.fsf@posteo.net> <87ftjxd30v.fsf@gnu.org> <874l0ag5kv.fsf@posteo.net> <87tv8a0x8u.fsf@devup.no> <87v9snnlto.fsf@posteo.net> <87wod02714.fsf@ngyro.com> <87o8ycgkma.fsf@posteo.net> <875zk3ui5p.fsf@posteo.net> <20191104203646.4181f4ca@gmail.com> <87y2wtx5b6.fsf@posteo.net> <20191106174604.GA1954@jasmine.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33333) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iSWQ6-0007YF-C2 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Nov 2019 20:17:09 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iSWQ5-0001IL-Dh for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Nov 2019 20:17:06 -0500 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]:51543) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iSWQ4-0001HO-US for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Nov 2019 20:17:05 -0500 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EDC1A2400FB for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2019 02:17:01 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <20191106174604.GA1954@jasmine.lan> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Leo Famulari Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On Wed, 2019-11-06 at 12:46 -0500, Leo Famulari wrote: > On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 06:38:05PM -0500, Kei Kebreau wrote: > > > - The patch for libdazzle only changes the xorg-server, as it > > > already > > > is at version 3.33.90 in master. It still makes sense as a > > > patch, > > > but the title indicates a version downgrade. > > > > > > > Good catch! I'd correct this commit message, but I don't know what > > the > > rules are for rewriting commit history on Guix WIP branches. For > > now > > I'll note your comment and leave the message alone. > > You can feel free to rewrite history completely on the WIP branches, > including commit messages. `git push --force-with-lease` doesn't seem to work on the WIP branch. This is a good thing in general, but how do I rewrite history? Do I just delete the remote WIP branch and recreate a new one with the appropriate changes?