From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id uFrRFto3FGBZVwAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2021 16:29:14 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id +N2FEto3FGBDEQAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2021 16:29:14 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91D2E9401C0 for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2021 16:29:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:55066 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l5We0-000219-E6 for larch@yhetil.org; Fri, 29 Jan 2021 11:29:12 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38334) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l5Wdt-00020o-7N for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Jan 2021 11:29:05 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:41291) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l5Wdp-0005cd-Ot for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Jan 2021 11:29:01 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l5Wdp-0000Q2-KU for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Jan 2021 11:29:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#46107] [PATCH 6/6] gnu: Add avogadro2. Resent-From: kkebreau@posteo.net Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2021 16:29:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46107 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Leo Famulari Received: via spool by 46107-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D46107.16119376981558 (code D ref 46107); Fri, 29 Jan 2021 16:29:01 +0000 Received: (at 46107-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Jan 2021 16:28:18 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52837 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l5Wd7-0000P2-TN for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 29 Jan 2021 11:28:18 -0500 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]:44100) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l5Wd5-0000O6-RX for 46107-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 29 Jan 2021 11:28:17 -0500 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39029160060 for <46107-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 29 Jan 2021 17:28:09 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1611937689; bh=sKX8O2+xOr0HDi/7e9FlJxi0Odwv/q4ObQs3B5BHGPU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:From; b=pXTO6PiUPuQxExlVoBP5ohL9q3glFihs0eT0ek/1ZPQXSTZkFjNBNrj3kd/nwy1gT G2g/zCOrwOcG9aqb8INpDoZk+YUqrZuBJO1jW3qwG2tjkXff5YOv6pC1sHXUX1CHht JOYkesk//2296mlM+XzqWi7kqaDjkQcnStBfPMZ5gE9HAPoTjvi6JjuSh0mK/L3kGl qtTpmzjnWjbNgAl//grfKNodsqqPT6zeuFBTGyeZh6WHP3WT6yObTB6ExznICQfsdo nmuwnuVSVUpaMtCWR0gYvPWV3ktg6/PjjXZAX9SdqcErt1VgZNwD9G5rqi4d45COfb Mx2zTpjTuQ3EA== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4DS2nh49yXz9rxM; Fri, 29 Jan 2021 17:28:08 +0100 (CET) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2021 11:28:08 -0500 From: kkebreau@posteo.net In-Reply-To: References: <20210125212248.4749-1-kkebreau@posteo.net> <20210125212248.4749-5-kkebreau@posteo.net> Message-ID: <5d4c2474cdc539f2792e70b0dbcf7fc4@posteo.net> X-Sender: kkebreau@posteo.net User-Agent: Posteo Webmail X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 46107-done@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -1.24 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b=pXTO6PiU; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (strict)" header.from=posteo.net (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 91D2E9401C0 X-Spam-Score: -1.24 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: Ew/80SPecYsM On 2021-01-28 20:05, Leo Famulari wrote: > On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 10:24:28PM -0500, Kei wrote: >> Done and done! Thanks for reviewing and commenting. Avogadro is >> clear for >> removal, especially since it doesn't seem to build anymore. > > Do you know if avogradro2 is suitable as a "drop-in" replacement for > avogadro? If so, we could mark it as superseded by avogadro2, and then > it would be automatically updated in users' profiles when they do `guix > pull && guix upgrade`. I think so. Development efforts seem to have been focused on Avogadro 2 for several years now, with little or no maintenance of the original Avogadro. This 2018 community survey [0] indicates the developers' full commitment to Avogadro 2, so marking it as superseding avogadro is recommended. [0]: https://avogadro.cc/news/community-survey-results/