From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hartmut Goebel Subject: Re: Do we really need our own installer? Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2017 12:08:24 +0200 Message-ID: <5a6ad47b-b5c8-a928-bb54-dd23c8a0b5c2@crazy-compilers.com> References: <9a7b0563-806c-fb95-f110-16ab42e2bff7@crazy-compilers.com> <87lgl6rerj.fsf@gnu.org> <0583108b-1e11-9e9d-6ef8-cdde7dfc058f@crazy-compilers.com> <878th2zw02.fsf@elephly.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40831) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dzgbS-0000xJ-DF for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Oct 2017 06:08:40 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dzgbM-000629-Np for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Oct 2017 06:08:34 -0400 In-Reply-To: <878th2zw02.fsf@elephly.net> Content-Language: en-US List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Ricardo Wurmus Cc: guix-devel Am 25.09.2017 um 16:35 schrieb Ricardo Wurmus: > This is not a binary choice. We can do both. I agree, but porting an installer is a lot of work and Ludo's answer was not quite encouraging for me. (No offense meant). So I might spend my time on other projects :-) -- Regards Hartmut Goebel | Hartmut Goebel | h.goebel@crazy-compilers.com | | www.crazy-compilers.com | compilers which you thought are impossible |