From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hartmut Goebel Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] gnu: Add postorius. Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 10:20:55 +0100 Message-ID: <588F0577.7090908@crazy-compilers.com> References: <20170129232617.19235-1-contact.ng0@cryptolab.net> <20170129232617.19235-7-contact.ng0@cryptolab.net> <8140b4ed-5f96-167b-98e7-5d17c9a95252@crazy-compilers.com> <8737g0x69n.fsf@wasp.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34901) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cY894-00015X-JB for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 04:21:07 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cY890-0005F8-K1 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 04:21:06 -0500 Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.9]:36036) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cY890-0005DC-Dg for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 04:21:02 -0500 In-Reply-To: <8737g0x69n.fsf@wasp.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: ng0 , guix-devel@gnu.org Hi, Am 30.01.2017 um 10:10 schrieb ng0: > >>> + (file-name (string-append name "-" version ".tar.gz")) >> I'd keep the original name, but this may be a matter of taste. > The original file name has some "+something2.tar.gz" in it, I want > to be consistent with what we provide. > Or what do you mean? I suggest keeping te original filename. But I don't know the exacpt conventions at Guix for this. > Thanks, I will apply this. They should fix their pypi source (if I got > it from there). ACK. >>> + (synopsis "Web user interface for GNU Mailman") >> Mention "Mailman 3"? > We only "have" version 3, why should I mention a version then? I > can do it... Did Mailman prior to version 3 have different > frontends than version 3? Mailman 3 is a completely new product. AFAIK most part are re-developed from scratch. OTOH at http://list.org/ they are just mentioning "Mailman" and "versions are 2.1.23 … and 3.0.3 …". An at mailman-bundler [1] they write "This is GNU Mailman" and "This package installs GNU Mailman". So probably we should stay with what you did: just call ist "Mailman". [1] https://pypi.python.org/pypi/mailman-bundler/3.0.0 > >> Please move it down to the description - I overlooked it first. > I assume you mean the "Web user interface for GNU Mailman 3". > In case I haven't mentioned it there, I will do so, okay. I meant the "synopsis" entry which I expect to be beside the description and not separate. -- Regards Hartmut Goebel | Hartmut Goebel | h.goebel@crazy-compilers.com | | www.crazy-compilers.com | compilers which you thought are impossible |