From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hartmut Goebel Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Add system start-up files for "guix publish". Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 18:17:59 +0100 Message-ID: <58332C47.2000004@crazy-compilers.com> References: <1479466834-3508-1-git-send-email-h.goebel@crazy-compilers.com> <1479466834-3508-3-git-send-email-h.goebel@crazy-compilers.com> <8760nh1agx.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57950) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c8sEH-0006CZ-VM for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 12:18:06 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c8sEE-0003XP-FN for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 12:18:05 -0500 In-Reply-To: <8760nh1agx.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: =?UTF-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=c3=a8s?= Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Am 21.11.2016 um 09:52 schrieb Ludovic Courtès: > I think this should rather go to “Invoking guix publish”, to avoid > making “Binary Installation” too intimidating (and because users do not > initially care about running ‘guix publish’). WDYT? > > Also, I think it would be enough to add a cross-reference to “Invoking > guix archive” where we mention that a key needs to be generated. Invoking guix publish is the perfect place: There already is a paragraph about enabling the service on GuixSD and also a reference to guix archive. Thanks for pointing there. -- Regards Hartmut Goebel | Hartmut Goebel | h.goebel@crazy-compilers.com | | www.crazy-compilers.com | compilers which you thought are impossible |