From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hartmut Goebel Subject: Re: Building many packages in order Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 14:15:35 +0200 Message-ID: <580A06E7.4080807@crazy-compilers.com> References: <5809F448.5030508@crazy-compilers.com> <87mvhyq7ay.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60549) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bxYje-0003fT-LS for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Oct 2016 08:15:43 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bxYjb-00032Y-6m for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Oct 2016 08:15:42 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87mvhyq7ay.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Roel Janssen Cc: guix-devel Am 21.10.2016 um 13:18 schrieb Roel Janssen: > You could create a meta-package (just a package recipe) that has all > python packages as inputs. Thanks for sharing this idea. Unfortunately this make it complicated to pass the version of the package (if there are several versions available), since I would need to know the correct variable name. -- Regards Hartmut Goebel | Hartmut Goebel | h.goebel@crazy-compilers.com | | www.crazy-compilers.com | compilers which you thought are impossible |