From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ben Woodcroft <b.woodcroft@uq.edu.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add Ribotaper.
Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2016 21:30:07 +1000
Message-ID: <578231BF.4000009@uq.edu.au>
References: <20160707092629.23884-1-ricardo.wurmus@mdc-berlin.de>
	<577E59D2.3010107@uq.edu.au>
	<idjwpkxtvdq.fsf@bimsb-sys02.mdc-berlin.net>
	<57802E95.1020305@uq.edu.au> <87mvlq38cv.fsf@elephly.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56579)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <b.woodcroft@uq.edu.au>) id 1bMCwK-0005es-Ea
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Jul 2016 07:30:25 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <b.woodcroft@uq.edu.au>) id 1bMCwG-0007Rw-AR
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Jul 2016 07:30:23 -0400
Received: from mailhub2.soe.uq.edu.au ([130.102.132.209]:37891
	helo=newmailhub.uq.edu.au) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <b.woodcroft@uq.edu.au>) id 1bMCwF-0007R4-NC
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Jul 2016 07:30:20 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87mvlq38cv.fsf@elephly.net>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Ricardo Wurmus <ricardo.wurmus@mdc-berlin.de>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org



On 10/07/16 05:43, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> Ben Woodcroft <b.woodcroft@uq.edu.au> writes:
>
>
>> The patch LGTM otherwise, except that I would unpack 'ORF' and use the
>> term 'ribo-seq' in the description. I've never looking at ribo-seq dat=
a
>> before and I'm not familiar, so I wasn't sure what 'ribosome profiling=
'
>> meant exactly e.g. is it measuring the amount of ribosome in a cell? I
>> realise that isn't true, just illustrating the point. Perhaps I am too
>> naive.
> I don=E2=80=99t know how to naturally include the term =E2=80=9Cribo-se=
q=E2=80=9D, so how about
> simply this:
>
>     Ribotaper is a method for defining translated @dfn{open reading
>     frames} (ORFs) using ribosome profiling (ribo-seq) data.  This
>     package provides the Ribotaper pipeline.
>
> Is this better?

Thanks for indulging my naivety. Looks good.

ben