From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ben Woodcroft Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: add kicad Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 21:35:57 +1000 Message-ID: <56C1B81D.2010407@uq.edu.au> References: <20160215084046.62d5307a@scratchpost.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43824) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aVHRu-0001YS-7R for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 06:36:15 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aVHRp-0006KP-4P for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 06:36:14 -0500 Received: from mailhub1.soe.uq.edu.au ([130.102.132.208]:37571 helo=newmailhub.uq.edu.au) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aVHRo-0006Ik-BR for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 06:36:08 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20160215084046.62d5307a@scratchpost.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Danny Milosavljevic , guix-devel@gnu.org Hi, Thanks for the patch. New contributors are most welcome. On 15/02/16 17:40, Danny Milosavljevic wrote: > this patch adds kicad, an electronics design automation tool, to "engineering.scm". > > What do I do with the optional stuff like scripting etc? Is there something like Gentoo USE flags? That depends on the situation. Sometimes 'extra' scripts form part of the regular distribution and included as normal, sometimes they are included as separate outputs if they are large in size (or as separate packages), and sometimes they are simply not included. It really depends on what you'd like to see packaged (and maintained). > Also, for this to work, wxwidgets.scm needs a 4 character patch. Do I add this here as well? Yes please. It isn't quite clear to me at this stage, but I would imagine a separate patch would be required. [...] Thanks. ben