Re: proposal: add "packagers" field (list of strings (names)) to package definition

[Florian Paul Schmidt <mista.tapas@gmx.net>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 12/03/2015 05:46 PM, Pjotr Prins wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 03:59:52PM +0100, Florian Paul Schmidt
> wrote:
>> Aww, too bad. I think it's a missed opportunity to be inclusive
>> and generous with attribution which might motivate people to
>> contribute. Guix is in a unique position with this opportunity.
> 
> Git history is conclusive. There is no stopping anyone mining and 
> creating outside meta-data.

True, except for one scenario: If someone proposes a package not as a
diff with authorship information, but just as a text via some other
channel. Or maybe just a good suggestion which someone that provided a
diff might deem worthy of a mention :)

But many roads lead to Rome, every approach has pros and cons. I'm not
pushing this any further

Flo



- -- 
https://fps.io
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWYLDVAAoJEA5f4Coltk8ZLm0H+wV3aNLTbEWU7d1qXSI7O1Is
9Ztc582iTQBanvTbzE3VqvCAGS/znF7gcjja1zM2CMZC5CGk5El5Pdtxno4n9EPs
Q7FDQ/NQiLqumC59EV6absyJ+hlCGQ0ySFeeCasdgDzoTMxKGXBJuZBRawsv1Gmc
TWkYf7VLNFA46JPtVWroqcPiGw0M/FjC80ztTk9hFsNf+lrFARqJSx47CbGxaTXD
PmhB8kwEqpILzREdD4s+JO+Hw5RCK3kCGVyqzUaomlwgqaZJHZEkIc21vtkPbz26
L8TB4idnEQFgr7rGtqfErYOSH6cNxYrlxVJjYboMIO/BlzynfwWvCTh3gCFRPs0=
=Agdj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----