From: Ben Woodcroft <b.woodcroft@uq.edu.au>
To: Ricardo Wurmus <ricardo.wurmus@mdc-berlin.de>,
"Thompson, David" <dthompson2@worcester.edu>
Cc: guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 11 little Ruby gems.
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2015 00:55:03 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5613E0C7.1020607@uq.edu.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <idjegh82hgm.fsf@bimsb-sys02.mdc-berlin.net>
On 07/10/15 00:35, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> Thompson, David <dthompson2@worcester.edu> writes:
>
>> Hey Ricardo,
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 5:12 AM, Ricardo Wurmus
>> <ricardo.wurmus@mdc-berlin.de> wrote:
>>> Hi Guix,
>>>
>>> attached are a couple of patches that resulted from a recent attempt to
>>> traverse the dependency graph for a dependency of some tool I wanted to
>>> package.
>>>
>>> I’m not happy with ‘0007-gnu-Add-ruby-rb-fsevent.patch’ because it is to
>>> be used on a Mac OSX, but unfortunately this is a required input for
>>> a more general file system library that is in my pipeline.
>>>
>>> I’m also not happy with disabling tests for ‘ruby-yard’, but I didn’t
>>> find a way to make them pass.
>> I pushed the first 6 patches with only a couple of minor
>> comment/description tweaks. Still need to look into what can be done
>> about patch 7 and the test suite for yard.
> According to [1] the Yard tests can only be run with RSpec version 2.12.
> Do you know of any compatibility layer that would allow us to run the
> tests with our more recent version of RSpec? I’m not keen on packaging
> a different version of RSpec (+ dependencies), to be honest.
>
> ~~ Ricardo
>
> [1]: https://github.com/lsegal/yard/issues/687#issuecomment-21759075
Hi Ricardo,
Stupidly not being aware of this thread I believe I've got ruby-yard
packaged without disabling tests just now, by packaging rspec-2 (and
skipping the 2 remaining failing tests that write to /homeless-shelter).
I think that issue on github might be incorrect (there's no rspec 2.14.3
on rubygems only 2.14.1 which seems to work for me). It actually means 4
new rspec-2 packages in total, there's no dependency issues beyond rspec
I don't think. Would you like me to send patches? My suspicion is that
there might be other packages that rely on rspec-2 out there, but that's
just a hunch more than anything.
ben
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-06 14:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-16 9:12 [PATCH] 11 little Ruby gems Ricardo Wurmus
2015-09-19 12:54 ` Thompson, David
2015-09-19 20:15 ` Ricardo Wurmus
2015-10-06 14:35 ` Ricardo Wurmus
2015-10-06 14:55 ` Ben Woodcroft [this message]
2015-10-06 18:25 ` Thompson, David
2015-10-07 9:08 ` Ben Woodcroft
2015-10-13 14:08 ` Ricardo Wurmus
2015-10-14 2:27 ` Ben Woodcroft
2015-10-30 16:22 ` Ricardo Wurmus
2015-10-31 10:33 ` Ludovic Courtès
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5613E0C7.1020607@uq.edu.au \
--to=b.woodcroft@uq.edu.au \
--cc=dthompson2@worcester.edu \
--cc=guix-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=ricardo.wurmus@mdc-berlin.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.