From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Cyril Roelandt Subject: Re: [PATCH] xscreenshot and imagefile Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 00:41:50 +0200 Message-ID: <55BAA82E.1080109@gmail.com> References: <87a8uf2c94.fsf@netris.org> <87oaiue4hh.fsf@netris.org> <20150730070405.GA9314@thebird.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59557) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZKwWW-0006Yn-4l for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jul 2015 18:42:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZKwWQ-00072Q-Vy for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jul 2015 18:42:00 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-x229.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::229]:37700) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZKwWQ-00071m-Ox for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jul 2015 18:41:54 -0400 Received: by wibud3 with SMTP id ud3so9939587wib.0 for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2015 15:41:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.10] (tal33-3-82-233-82-24.fbx.proxad.net. [82.233.82.24]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id q19sm1307341wik.16.2015.07.30.15.41.51 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 30 Jul 2015 15:41:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20150730070405.GA9314@thebird.nl> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: guix-devel@gnu.org On 07/30/2015 09:04 AM, Pjotr Prins wrote: > How about creating a policy that people can refer to? Well, I'm not sure we want to add any bureaucracy :) Apart from that, I completely agree with your post, there is no reason to reject xscreenshot (yet). Cyril.