From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Bruno_F=c3=a9lix_Rezende_Ribeiro?= Subject: Re: [ART] Background image for GRUB Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2014 12:09:51 -0200 Message-ID: <545A2FAF.3030103@gnu.org> References: <54594B40.9040008@openmailbox.org> <545951BE.5080301@gnu.org> <87tx2d6aog.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="epB7chf2qerD8F85CacTVfnXHQcolcouS" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58663) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xm1Hi-000884-3I for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Nov 2014 09:10:11 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xm1Hc-00077i-LB for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Nov 2014 09:10:06 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:33122) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xm1Hc-00077e-Ip for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Nov 2014 09:10:00 -0500 Received: from 189-015-228-073.xd-dynamic.ctbcnetsuper.com.br ([189.15.228.73]:35162 helo=[192.168.1.17]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xm1Hc-0003tS-2E for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Nov 2014 09:10:00 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87tx2d6aog.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: guix-devel@gnu.org This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --epB7chf2qerD8F85CacTVfnXHQcolcouS Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) wrote: > Agreed. But note that RMS asked me to not insist on calling the OS=20 > =E2=80=9Cthe GNU system=E2=80=9D, at least for now (AIUI, his main conc= ern is that=20 > GNU =3D GNU/Hurd, which is not currently supported.) I wonder if RMS has a good argument to justify his insistence in the truthfulness of the equation 'GNU =3D GNU/Hurd' beyond the well-known historical and technical ones. =46rom a strategical perspective, I fail to see why the distinction between GNU/Linux-libre and GNU/Hurd could be of any relevance. IMHO, calling both simply "GNU" would help in the promotion of the GNU project and its ideals. That would not cause confusion, because GNU would be defined as an operating system of multiple kernels, and technical-inclined people would always know how to tell the difference when needed or appropriate. --=20 ,=3D ,-_-. =3D. Bruno F=C3=A9lix Rezende Ribeiro (oitofelix) [0x28D618A= F] ((_/)o o(\_)) There is no system but GNU; `-'(. .)`-' GNU Linux-Libre is one of its official kernels; \_/ All software must be free as in freedom; --epB7chf2qerD8F85CacTVfnXHQcolcouS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJUWi+vAAoJECe5xv0o1hivRqMH/28OPFaNEGyfiUkXBB+L2rEp 9loLu7F8Xb5xjmhlUhc0+9AZQ1OBfnLg65AyqWrO/FTduhdOjdVIJ7AbQoXoEjSU VzUx0YETIHYHv9PlATG8n4zp44N7vK8KXExA8NE3ADNyiYQg1nki3JtbuWg69Jj3 waGPADBcLNyYCkvlWS/sMsplHR2Oh7Q09NJkfMe6eNSXTIvYGDxwS8kjK5tTvs21 MJCcpesugYhNc6QXTqVAhZkl6hc60suKOSTLtClL3UYEeSMUSUbqWftbJU8ruif/ 2TX8FOB3gFQEhWh+gdehI9JscBL96HUU2/tgRDq6WA0XRktn08XH1pb7tcjT0FQ= =KRaX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --epB7chf2qerD8F85CacTVfnXHQcolcouS--