From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id qPigMYvdQl/DdAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 23 Aug 2020 21:20:11 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id kCiILYvdQl8TPAAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 23 Aug 2020 21:20:11 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84A5E940145 for ; Sun, 23 Aug 2020 21:20:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:37118 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k9xPO-0001hI-Fe for larch@yhetil.org; Sun, 23 Aug 2020 17:20:10 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53756) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k9xPD-0001fB-85 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Aug 2020 17:19:59 -0400 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]:58123) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k9xPA-00074s-0y for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Aug 2020 17:19:58 -0400 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A20B42400FD for ; Sun, 23 Aug 2020 23:19:52 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1598217592; bh=VFanGBt//8Iar9RIz+EcKxjM/Sc85c293W2qu3fROgs=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:From; b=LFB6fJNcZA0aeEB+vW5uZ4kef4uZaVvgHGzvVKoDAfssxSJag5bSDnG/I+QNQUq4x ZZIR1ED02LX/Vkor0uWZ5qhvmWRGB6++MCH/YB9uVsEBxAPndByQIgMCh8Ek1ZEVE5 oqPKPC+WgIfJYRzy+TjLlWNqVPLUba7jMFelkZm9EVly+QR6D5ZDnthgLHU5wBb5gt +rl6qLEQjccQYqHzLCjfpQFgjVyJUNcrfLflkiqDgXfqz/lTHVVaf6vhMRF9gNoi7E 04xZDgc64morUPTv86tkFi7ATxcxcNhBN06dJOhv2ytQErTmjs8+LN6n10747SZ2YY IJLr0EbI3yVUw== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4BZSng5GQSz9rxD; Sun, 23 Aug 2020 23:19:51 +0200 (CEST) From: HiPhish To: Ekaitz Zarraga , "guix-devel@gnu.org" Subject: Re: Questions about Git and workflow Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2020 23:19:50 +0200 Message-ID: <5410980.DvuYhMxLoT@ixtreme-m5740> In-Reply-To: <91zmPR1gTCLWl2DVqAGykD6p_KDI43ku_B49ApV7YZ0on3FTR0hwe5bc4GVrrWHvK0TwaEp4WjufET8hWrr7pWySRe0AsZxwbkADqcEeJK0=@elenq.tech> References: <2818350.e9J7NaK4W3@ixtreme-m5740> <5426872.DvuYhMxLoT@ixtreme-m5740> <91zmPR1gTCLWl2DVqAGykD6p_KDI43ku_B49ApV7YZ0on3FTR0hwe5bc4GVrrWHvK0TwaEp4WjufET8hWrr7pWySRe0AsZxwbkADqcEeJK0=@elenq.tech> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.66; envelope-from=hiphish@posteo.de; helo=mout02.posteo.de X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/08/23 17:19:53 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.11 and newer X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=posteo.de header.s=2017 header.b=LFB6fJNc; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=posteo.de; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -0.71 X-TUID: 3c7PbH996vW4 On Friday, 21 August 2020 22:59:32 CEST Ekaitz Zarraga wrote: > Thanks for bringing the question btw. I was worried about my workflow being > correct and it happens to be! Yeah, I wouldn't be surprised if there are more people who would like to contribute, but then stumble on these minor irregularities and just give up. I had contributed a few patches in the past, but each time it felt like stepping on eggshells to me. It would be nice if one of the maintainers could have chimed in.