From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Cyril Roelandt Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add nvi Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 12:09:33 +0200 Message-ID: <5405975D.70604@gmail.com> References: <54047591.9080902@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43342) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XOl25-0004QM-52 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Sep 2014 06:09:58 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XOl1v-0000zY-OG for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Sep 2014 06:09:49 -0400 Received: from mail-we0-x22a.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c03::22a]:47419) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XOl1v-0000zS-HA for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Sep 2014 06:09:39 -0400 Received: by mail-we0-f170.google.com with SMTP id p10so6699286wes.15 for ; Tue, 02 Sep 2014 03:09:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.10] (tal33-3-82-233-82-24.fbx.proxad.net. [82.233.82.24]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id fo19sm32823716wic.1.2014.09.02.03.09.37 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 02 Sep 2014 03:09:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <54047591.9080902@gmail.com> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: guix-devel@gnu.org On 09/01/2014 03:33 PM, Marek Benc wrote: > Disregard my previous email, I figured it out. > > Here is my favorite text editor. This is my first package, so I'm sorry > if I messed up somewhere. > The formatting is probably bad, but every package seemed to be formatted > slightly differently, so I don't know. > > --- a/gnu/packages/nvi.scm 2014-09-01 15:22:45.219850258 +0200 Maybe we should have all vi-like editors in one file. We currently have vim in gnu/packages/vim.scm, maybe we should have both nvi and vim in gnu/packages/vi.scm, WDYT ? Cyril.