From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Cyril Roelandt Subject: Re: Transition to /gnu/store Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 21:11:51 +0100 Message-ID: <531E1C87.9030005@gmail.com> References: <87eh2myiqy.fsf@gnu.org> <87y50qlzmx.fsf@yeeloong.lan> <87fvmxrj21.fsf_-_@gnu.org> <87r46b7yvu.fsf@gnu.org> <20140310141806.GB9152@debian.univ-mrs.fr> <874n35n74v.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44434) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WN6dt-000616-PN for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 16:17:51 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WN6do-0008JZ-0M for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 16:17:45 -0400 Received: from mail-wg0-x22d.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c00::22d]:53786) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WN6dn-0008JT-Po for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 16:17:39 -0400 Received: by mail-wg0-f45.google.com with SMTP id l18so8765300wgh.4 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 13:17:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.10] (tal33-3-82-233-82-24.fbx.proxad.net. [82.233.82.24]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id 19sm2611611wjy.17.2014.03.10.13.17.36 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 10 Mar 2014 13:17:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <874n35n74v.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: guix-devel@gnu.org On 03/10/2014 09:14 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Andreas Enge skribis: > >> Would it not be the time now to merge core-updates back into master, as >> anyway everything will be rebuilt? > > We need to discuss with Mark whether to release Guile 2.0.10, or just > patch it the way Cyril proposed a while back. But that’s basically the > only thing left to figure out, yes. > I'd sort of want my Python patches in the next merge, too, and they are currently being discussed with upstream. Cyril.