From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Thompson Subject: bug#15615: Pulseaudio build fails Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 18:45:28 -0400 Message-ID: <525C7408.5080409@worcester.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50868) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VVrqy-0006zt-Aj for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 19:47:22 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VVrqo-0007kn-Ex for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 19:47:12 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:35491) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VVrqo-0007kj-Ba for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 19:47:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VVrqo-0007hm-27 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 19:47:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42050) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VVqtN-0001ma-27 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 18:45:45 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VVqtE-0008Qv-NA for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 18:45:36 -0400 Received: from na3sys009aog124.obsmtp.com ([74.125.149.151]:52472) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VVqtE-0008Qp-Ed for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 18:45:28 -0400 Received: by mail-qc0-f180.google.com with SMTP id p19so5252863qcv.25 for ; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 15:45:26 -0700 (PDT) List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: 15615@debbugs.gnu.org `guix build pulseaudio` fails because of the following test: Running suite(s): Memblock shm_open() failed: Function not implemented 0%: Checks: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0 tests/memblock-test.c:86:F:memblock:memblock_test:0: Assertion 'pool_a != NULL' failed FAIL: memblock-test Does this happen for anyone else or just me? - Dave