From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Cyril Roelandt Subject: Re: patch for list-packages Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 01:38:07 +0200 Message-ID: <5208205F.1010103@gmail.com> References: <87mwoxw6i0.fsf@honeybear.home> <874naw9dm6.fsf@honeybear.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35013) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V8fVm-0007p4-R2 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Aug 2013 19:57:35 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V8fVd-0002JL-O6 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Aug 2013 19:57:26 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-x22c.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::22c]:33533) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V8fVd-0002J0-IZ for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Aug 2013 19:57:17 -0400 Received: by mail-wi0-f172.google.com with SMTP id hj13so1098739wib.17 for ; Sun, 11 Aug 2013 16:57:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.10] (tal33-3-82-233-82-24.fbx.proxad.net. [82.233.82.24]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id r6sm13438838wiw.0.2013.08.11.16.57.14 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 11 Aug 2013 16:57:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <874naw9dm6.fsf@honeybear.home> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: guix-devel@gnu.org On 08/11/2013 10:28 PM, Alex Sassmannshausen wrote: > I'm quite happy with the result. Feedback and comments welcome — > especially as I'm still pretty new to the collective work-flow. This looks really nice, except for the "back to top" icon that comes on top of the "expand" links (yes, my browser window is not very wide). I believe it's a very common issue that should not be treated as a bug though :) I don't think I'll have time to look at the code before Thursday, though. Btw, I can't see the patches as attachements, only inlined. Is it a problem with my mail client or does everybody witness the same behaviour ? Regards, Cyril Roelandt.