From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49548)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1isE1c-0004Ho-1u
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 17:54:05 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1isE1a-0004sY-20
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 17:54:03 -0500
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:60834)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1isE1Z-0004sQ-Uh
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 17:54:02 -0500
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1isE1Z-0002V2-U3
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 17:54:01 -0500
Subject: [bug#39086] [PATCH 3/5] gnu: Add unicode-cldr-common.
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.39086.B39086.15792152069561@debbugs.gnu.org>
Message-ID: <51f014f61bee4c453c50d954b501a3b1dc17370e.camel@student.tugraz.at>
From: Leo Prikler <leo.prikler@student.tugraz.at>
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2020 23:53:26 +0100
In-Reply-To: <87imlbxg7a.fsf@elephly.net>
References: <20200111120829.29821-1-leo.prikler@student.tugraz.at>
 <20200111120829.29821-3-leo.prikler@student.tugraz.at>
 <87imlbxg7a.fsf@elephly.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>
Cc: 39086@debbugs.gnu.org

Am Donnerstag, den 16.01.2020, 22:08 +0100 schrieb Ricardo Wurmus:
> Leo Prikler <leo.prikler@student.tugraz.at> writes:
> 
> > * gnu/packages/ibus (unicode-cldr-commmon): New package.
> 
> This should be:
> 
>     * gnu/packages/ibus.scm (unicode-cldr-commmon): New variable.
> 
> You know, I wonder if these things really belong to ibus.scm.  I
> remember a TODO somewhere in the code that bemoaned the lack of
> versioned Unicode data files.  Perhaps we should just add a new
> module
> (gnu packages unicode) — what do you think?
I don't mind either way, but these packages don't fix the TODO.  They
add yet unseen features.

> > +(define-public unicode-cldr-common
> > +  (package
> > +    (name "unicode-cldr-common")
> > +    (version "36")
> > +    (source
> > +     (origin (method url-fetch/zipbomb)
> > +             (uri "
> > https://unicode.org/Public/cldr/36/cldr-common-36.0.zip")
> > +             (sha256
> > +              (base32
> > +
> > "0hxsc3j5zb32hmiaj0r3ajchmklx6zng6zlh1ca6s9plq5b9w9q7"))))
> 
> The version should be “36.0”.  The source URI should reference the
> version field twice.
The thing is, the Unicode people are really messy with their
versioning, so I feel safer if I at least just use version once. 
Basically, they have 36/36.0, but 36.1/36.1, which makes no sense
whatsoever.

> 
> > +    (description
> > +     "The Unicode Common Locale Data Repository (CLDR) is a large
> > repository of
> > +locale data, including among others
> > +- patterns for formatting and parsing,
> > +- name translations,
> > +- and various informations on languages, scripts and country-
> > specific
> > +conventions.")
> > +    (license unicode)))
> 
> Please use @enumerate or @itemize texinfo syntax here.
Will do.