From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Cyril Roelandt <tipecaml@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Add tcsh.
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2013 11:10:54 +0100
Message-ID: <51137DAE.2000601@gmail.com>
References: <5112EF85.707@gmail.com>
	<1360195757-27268-1-git-send-email-tipecaml@gmail.com>
	<201302071029.00313.andreas@enge.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:39812)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <tipecaml@gmail.com>) id 1U3Ocf-0007I3-3w
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2013 05:22:31 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <tipecaml@gmail.com>) id 1U3Oca-0001W2-FV
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2013 05:22:29 -0500
Received: from mail-ee0-f53.google.com ([74.125.83.53]:33430)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <tipecaml@gmail.com>) id 1U3Oca-0001Vv-9g
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2013 05:22:24 -0500
Received: by mail-ee0-f53.google.com with SMTP id e53so1236183eek.12
	for <bug-guix@gnu.org>; Thu, 07 Feb 2013 02:22:22 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <201302071029.00313.andreas@enge.fr>
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr>
Cc: bug-guix@gnu.org

On 02/07/2013 10:29 AM, Andreas Enge wrote:
> Hello,
>
> does tcsh include a csh binary? If not, would it make sense to add a
> symbolic link? I have seen the patch-shebangs phase complain about a
> missing csh interpreter (apparently without any incidence, since the tests
> pass, but it would nevertheless be nice to patch correctly).
>

We could do that, since tcsh is fully compatible with csh, but shouldn't 
we rather package csh as well ? The "csh" package in Debian uses sources 
from the OpenBSD CVS repository, so we'd need a cvs-fetch method.

WDYT ?

Cyril.