From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Robert Vollmert Subject: =?utf-8?Q?Re=3A_Guix_beyond_1=2E0=3A_let=E2=80=99s_have_a_roadmap?= =?utf-8?Q?!?= Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2019 15:38:43 +0200 Message-ID: <504D1A97-2EBD-46A1-85B8-091C923DD6A1@vllmrt.net> References: <877e97vws8.fsf@gnu.org> <87zhlz1aiq.fsf@roquette.mug.biscuolo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47348) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hha2f-0002lN-AD for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Jun 2019 09:38:54 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hha2e-00033b-7X for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Jun 2019 09:38:53 -0400 Received: from mx2a.mailbox.org ([2001:67c:2050:104:0:2:25:2]:13666 helo=mx2.mailbox.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hha2e-00030l-1G for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Jun 2019 09:38:52 -0400 Received: from smtp1.mailbox.org (smtp1.mailbox.org [IPv6:2001:67c:2050:105:465:1:1:0]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx2.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20C9FA002C for ; Sun, 30 Jun 2019 15:38:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp1.mailbox.org ([80.241.60.240]) by spamfilter04.heinlein-hosting.de (spamfilter04.heinlein-hosting.de [80.241.56.122]) (amavisd-new, port 10030) with ESMTP id xaJ8iN1LpluG for ; Sun, 30 Jun 2019 15:38:43 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <87zhlz1aiq.fsf@roquette.mug.biscuolo.net> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: guix-devel@gnu.org (this should really be a top-level reply, but I missed the original = mail) On 30. Jun 2019, at 15:13, Giovanni Biscuolo wrote: >=20 > Hello, >=20 > Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: >=20 > [...] >=20 >> What do *you* want Guix to address in the future? >>=20 >> #+TITLE: GNU Guix Beyond 1.0=E2=80=94A Road Map A bit of an outside opinion, here. I=E2=80=99d love to see a concerted = effort making the ecosystem a bit more friendly to work with, along the lines of - better stack traces when things go wrong (this would be both guile = work and guix guile-module work as far as I can tell) - more consistent and useful output =E2=80=94 currently it=E2=80=99s = very easy to miss the actual cause of an error between a lot of noise, e.g. all those = =E2=80=9Crecompiling scheme module=E2=80=9D messages