From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hartmut Goebel Subject: Re: New python build system merged Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 16:02:52 +0100 Message-ID: <4eb0fcd0-3dee-2744-9469-9208d397f3e7@crazy-compilers.com> References: <58383346.5090608@crazy-compilers.com> <20161126044853.GB15256@jasmine> <583BF716.2060009@crazy-compilers.com> <87d1hfd8p8.fsf@gnu.org> <583D503D.6050209@crazy-compilers.com> <87k2bm745d.fsf@gnu.org> <583DC457.6060200@crazy-compilers.com> <20161129211200.GA17078@jasmine> <20161130092006.6228a04c@scratchpost.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58124) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cC6PY-000556-0F for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 10:03:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cC6PS-0003kH-CQ for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 10:03:04 -0500 Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.10]:49914) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cC6PS-0003k2-6Q for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 10:02:58 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20161130092006.6228a04c@scratchpost.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Danny Milosavljevic , Leo Famulari Cc: guix-devel Am 30.11.2016 um 09:20 schrieb Danny Milosavljevic: > I think it depends on how much work fixing them is. If it were just five minutes then I'd say leave it in master and fix the packages that failed. > > Otherwise revert. I strongly against reverting this! We already have a backlog of several python packages which are using "setuptools" as input. If reverting the new python build system, we need to clean them all up later. We need to go forward instead of reverting. Fixing up the build issues should be easy since the changes are not fundamental. > However, Hartmut, I think that Build 1637640 is not even done building all the packages yet (1853 I'm curious (I do not understand hydra yet), but AKAIU a "build" is about a single package. And https://hydra.gnu.org/build/1637640 builds calibre. There is no queue not other packages. I assume you are talking about evaluation 109379 , which the above build is part of. This evaluation is outdated. I already fixed some of the errors you listed, others did not occur on my system when trying to reproduce. -- Regards Hartmut Goebel | Hartmut Goebel | h.goebel@crazy-compilers.com | | www.crazy-compilers.com | compilers which you thought are impossible |