From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Vincent Legoll <vincent.legoll@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Hyperlinks!
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2020 15:51:31 +0200
Message-ID: <49bca4fa-6db5-1ab0-a181-98a9ef3bb104@gmail.com>
References: <87eesrlkil.fsf@gnu.org>
 <9aae8a60-018e-bdcf-315a-ae43aadf51a4@gmail.com> <87eesrjy2i.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45292)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <vincent.legoll@gmail.com>) id 1jNzUw-0005yn-Iu
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 09:51:39 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <vincent.legoll@gmail.com>) id 1jNzUu-0004zu-Et
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 09:51:38 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87eesrjy2i.fsf@gnu.org>
Content-Language: en-US
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
 <guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel"
 <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
To: =?UTF-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=c3=a8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Hello,

On 13/04/2020 15:48, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Vincent Legoll <vincent.legoll@gmail.com> skribis:
>
>> 1st bug report ? :P
>>
>> OK, not strictly a bug report since it's on the
>> wrong ML...
>>
>> on the page:
>> https://guix.gnu.org/manual/devel/en/html_node/Using-the-Configuration-System.html
>>
>> The %base-packages is not cross-referenced,
>> whereas all the other %base-* are.
> That’s because there’s no @defvr (variable definition) in the manual for
> ‘%base-packages’.
>
>> Should I create an issue for it ?
> Just send a patch adding a @defvr for %base-packages.  :-)

I've seen other similar issues, let's see if I can manage to fix
them myself...

-- 
Vincent Legoll